Lesson 3.1.2.4.1
3.1.2.4.1 Illusion explanations: ambiguity, misread depth cues, fiction, size constancy Quiz: AQA Psychology, Unit 2
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.1.2.4.1, Illusion explanations: ambiguity, misread depth cues, fiction, size constancy: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA GCSE Psychology (8182), Unit 2: Perception, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What does the explanation of illusions as ambiguity mean?
- The image has been stored in memory in a form that makes it hard to recall in full later on
- The image is so large that it cannot be seen as a whole by the viewer's eyes in one look
- The image can be interpreted in more than one way, so the viewer may see either of two possible forms
- The image is too clear to interpret, so the viewer sees only its colour and brightness at first
-
Which illusion is best explained by ambiguity?
- The Ames room, in which a trapezoid room appears to be a normal rectangular room to the viewer
- The Kanizsa triangle, in which a triangle seems to have edges where none are actually drawn
- The Necker cube, whose wire-frame drawing can be seen in two different orientations
- The Ponzo illusion, in which two equal horizontal lines between converging lines look different
-
What does misreading depth cues mean as an explanation of illusions?
- A depth cue is ignored in a 3D scene, so every object looks the same size and distance to the viewer
- A depth cue is applied to a 2D image where it does not belong, so the size or distance is judged wrongly
- A depth cue is stored in sensory memory for too long, so the viewer keeps seeing it after it has gone
- A depth cue is used only by one eye, so the two eyes send contradictory information to the brain
-
Which illusion is most often explained by misreading depth cues?
- The Ponzo illusion, where linear perspective makes the upper of two equal lines seem longer
- The Rubin's vase, where the figure can be seen as a vase or as two faces in the same image
- The Necker cube, where the drawing can be seen as two different 3D cubes at the same time
- The Kanizsa triangle, where the triangle's edges are filled in by the brain as illusory contours
-
What does fiction mean as an explanation of an illusion?
- The brain stores a copy of the image in the sensory store for longer than it actually lasts
- The brain deliberately ignores the image so that the viewer can remember the shape instead
- The brain uses a fictional story from memory to decide the size of an object in the scene
- The brain creates a contour or shape that is not actually present in the image
-
Which illusion is best explained by fiction?
- The Ames room, because the room looks rectangular when it is actually a trapezoid in shape
- The Necker cube, because the drawing can be seen as two different cubes in different positions
- The Kanizsa triangle, because the brain fills in edges of a triangle that are not drawn
- The Müller-Lyer illusion, because the fins make one line look longer than the other line
-
What does size constancy have to do with illusions?
- Objects are judged to keep the same position, so a misapplied movement cue makes lines look longer
- Objects are judged to keep the same colour, so a misapplied brightness cue makes lines look different
- Objects are judged to keep a constant real size, so a misapplied depth cue can make a line look bigger or smaller
- Objects are judged to keep the same number of parts, so a misapplied count makes shapes look different
-
Which illusion is linked to size constancy in the specification?
- The Müller-Lyer illusion, where two equal lines look different in length because of their fins
- The Necker cube, where a line drawing flips between two different orientations in the view
- The Kanizsa triangle, where edges appear where no lines are drawn in the image of the shape
- Rubin's vase, where the figure and background swap as the viewer looks at the picture
-
A drawing shows two equal horizontal lines between converging lines. The upper one looks longer. Which explanation fits best?
- Ambiguity, because the lines can be seen as two different shapes at the same time in the view
- Fiction, because the brain fills in a line between the converging lines that is not drawn
- Occlusion, because the upper line hides part of the lower line in the drawing for the viewer
- Misreading of linear perspective cues, so the upper line is judged to be further away and larger
-
Why does the Necker cube illustrate ambiguity rather than misread depth cues?
- Because the drawing has two equally valid 3D interpretations, so neither is a mistake
- Because the drawing is so large that the viewer's sensory store cannot hold all of it at once
- Because the drawing has no depth cues at all, so the viewer's eyes cannot judge its shape
- Because the drawing is a fiction, so the brain fills in the edges of a cube that are not drawn
-
A viewer sees a shape that appears to have edges where none are drawn. Which explanation fits?
- Size constancy, because the shape is judged to be larger than its real size on the page
- Fiction, because the brain creates a contour that is not present in the image
- Misread depth cues, because the shape has been placed in the wrong position on the page
- Ambiguity, because the shape can be seen in two valid orientations by the viewer in turn
-
Which statement about the explanations of visual illusions is correct?
- Illusions can be explained by ambiguity, misread depth cues, fiction or size constancy
- Illusions can only be explained by the serial position of the lines within the drawing shown
- Illusions can only be explained by sensory memory decay, which removes parts of the image
- Illusions can only be explained by the number of receptors in the eye, which is fixed at birth
-
A viewer sees a vase in one moment and two faces in the next. Which explanation applies?
- Ambiguity, because the picture supports two valid interpretations that the viewer switches between
- Fiction, because the brain creates the faces from edges that are not drawn in the picture
- Size constancy, because the faces are judged to be larger than the vase in the picture
- Misread depth cues, because the faces are placed further away from the viewer than the vase
-
Why do illusions that involve depth cues tend to be strong?
- Because depth cues cannot be applied to two-dimensional drawings, so they always make an error
- Because the cues usually help people judge size and distance correctly in everyday scenes
- Because depth cues are stored in the sensory store, which holds them for a long time after the view
- Because depth cues are only used by the short-term store, which makes them easy to confuse
-
Which feature of the Necker cube makes it an ambiguous figure?
- Its wire-frame drawing has a solid surface, so the viewer sees one orientation only at all times
- Its wire-frame drawing has no solid surface, so the viewer can see it in either of two orientations
- Its wire-frame drawing is so small that the sensory store cannot hold a clear image of it
- Its wire-frame drawing is coloured, so the colours make the viewer see a fixed shape
-
What is the best way to describe a misread depth cue illusion?
- A depth cue is stored in long-term memory and is recalled in the wrong order by the viewer
- A depth cue is missing from the picture, so the viewer cannot judge depth or size at all
- A depth cue that works in flat pictures is applied to a real scene, leading to a correct judgement
- A depth cue that works in real scenes is applied to a flat picture, leading to a wrong judgement
-
Which explanation would account for two equal lines looking different because of arrow fins at their ends?
- Ambiguity, because the two lines can be seen as two different shapes that flip in the view
- Fiction, because the brain adds extra lines between the arrow fins that are not drawn at all
- Misread depth cues, because the fins look like the corners of a room, suggesting different distances
- Serial position, because the line at the start of the drawing is recalled better than the line at the end
-
A student thinks an illusion is caused by missing information from the sensory store. Which claim is most accurate?
- Illusions are caused by the sensory store losing information, so the viewer sees an incomplete image
- Illusions are caused by the short-term store holding too many items, so the viewer confuses them
- Illusions are caused by how the brain interprets the image, not by losing information from the store
- Illusions are caused by the long-term store forgetting the shape, so the viewer can only guess it
-
Which statement about the Kanizsa triangle is correct?
- It is a drawing that flips between two orientations, so the triangle can be seen in two different ways
- It has no drawn edges, so the triangle is perceived through illusory contours created by the brain
- It is a three-dimensional figure, so the triangle is judged only by its depth cues in the picture
- It is a drawing with complete edges, so the triangle is seen directly from the image shown to the viewer
-
A student says the Müller-Lyer lines look different because one is actually longer. Which reply is best?
- No, the lines are equal, and the difference comes from how the fins are read as depth cues
- Yes, the line with fins is longer, because the fins add real length to the line in the drawing
- Yes, the lines differ, because the sensory store holds one line for longer than the other line
- No, the lines look different only because one is rehearsed more often in the short-term store
Related quizzes
- Difference between sensation and perception Quiz · 3.1.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Monocular depth cues: height in plane, relative size, occlusion, linear perspective Quiz · 3.1.2.2.1 · 20 questions
- Binocular depth cues: retinal disparity and convergence Quiz · 3.1.2.2.2 · 20 questions
- Direct perception without inference and the influence of nature Quiz · 3.1.2.3.1 · 20 questions
- Role of motion parallax in everyday perception Quiz · 3.1.2.3.2 · 20 questions
- Examples: Ponzo, Muller-Lyer, Rubin's vase, Ames Room, Kanizsa triangle, Necker cube Quiz · 3.1.2.4.2 · 20 questions
- Inference from visual cues and past experience to construct reality Quiz · 3.1.2.5.1 · 20 questions
- Perceptual set and the influence of culture, motivation, emotion and expectation Quiz · 3.1.2.6.1 · 20 questions
- Gilchrist and Nesberg study of motivation Quiz · 3.1.2.6.2 · 20 questions
- Bruner and Minturn study of perceptual set Quiz · 3.1.2.6.3 · 20 questions