Lesson 3.1.2.3.1
3.1.2.3.1 Direct perception without inference and the influence of nature Quiz: AQA Psychology, Unit 2
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.1.2.3.1, Direct perception without inference and the influence of nature: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA GCSE Psychology (8182), Unit 2: Perception, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What does Gibson's direct theory of perception say about the information from the environment?
- The environment provides only sensory fragments, which the brain must build into whole scenes
- The real world provides enough information for direct perception, without the need for inference
- The environment provides information only in the form of stored memories held in the brain
- The environment provides too little information, so the brain must infer the rest from memory
-
What does 'direct perception without inference' mean?
- Seeing the environment only when prior knowledge has been used to test a hypothesis about it
- Seeing the environment as it is, with no need for the brain to build a model from memory
- Seeing the environment in fragments, which the brain must join together to build a full scene
- Seeing the environment only after the brain has built a model from memory and past experience
-
Gibson's theory is described as the influence of nature. What does this mean?
- Perceptual abilities are the same for every species, because they are all shaped by culture
- Perceptual abilities depend on the natural light outdoors, with no role for the brain at all
- Perceptual abilities are largely learnt from experience, rather than being shaped by evolution
- Perceptual abilities are largely innate, shaped by evolution, rather than learnt from experience
-
Which contrast best describes Gibson's view compared with Gregory's?
- Gibson says perception is an inference built from experience, while Gregory says it is direct and innate
- Gibson says perception depends on the sensory store, while Gregory says it depends on the short-term store
- Gibson says perception is direct and innate, while Gregory says it is an inference built from experience
- Gibson says perception depends on serial position, while Gregory says it depends on interference
-
Why does Gibson argue that perception needs no inference?
- Because the light reaching the eyes carries enough structured information about the world to act on
- Because the brain stores all objects in memory, so no new information is needed from the eyes
- Because perception only happens after rehearsal, so inference is never needed for objects
- Because the eyes receive so little information that the brain must guess what the object is
-
Which example best supports Gibson's idea of direct perception?
- A student works out the distance of a tree using a guess built from remembered sizes of trees
- A child decides an object is a cup after testing a hypothesis against several stored memories
- A viewer sees a shape as a face only after building it up from separate lines in the brain
- A driver judges the speed of an approaching car using the information in the moving scene around them
-
What role does nature play in Gibson's theory?
- Learnt abilities allow people to store the information in the environment so that it can be used
- Motivation decides which information in the environment can be picked up by people at each time
- Culture decides which information in the environment can be picked up by people as they grow
- Innate, evolved abilities allow people to pick up the information that is already present in the environment
-
Which feature of Gibson's theory would a critic most likely question?
- Whether the eyes can detect light, since the receptors are well understood to work correctly
- Whether sensory memory can hold an exact copy of input for under one second in the store
- Whether the short-term store can hold about seven items, as the multi-store model proposes
- Whether the environment really contains enough information for perception to need no inference at all
-
A researcher argues that people see the world directly. Which evidence would support Gibson's view?
- Perception of depth improving when people move, because the information in the moving scene is picked up
- Perception of depth being worse for objects that are rehearsed in the short-term memory store
- Perception of depth being the same whether the person moves or stays still in the room
- Perception of depth depending on the number of objects that the person has learnt in the past
-
Which statement best sums up Gibson's direct theory?
- Perception is inferred because the environment provides little information, so people build models from memory
- Perception is direct because the environment provides the information, which people pick up through innate abilities
- Perception is stored because the environment provides information, which people keep in memory for later use
- Perception is serial because the environment provides information, which people recall in order later on
-
In Gibson's view, why is perception not a process of building a model?
- Because models are only built for objects that have been rehearsed in short-term memory first
- Because the information is already present in the environment and can be picked up directly
- Because building a model is faster than picking up information, so it is always used instead
- Because the model has to be stored first in the sensory store before it is used to perceive
-
Which feature of the environment would Gibson most likely use as evidence for direct perception?
- Patterns of light that are only ever shown in fixed pictures on a screen in front of the viewer
- Patterns of light that stay exactly the same no matter how the observer moves in the scene
- Patterns of light that change in a systematic way as an observer moves through the environment
- Patterns of light that are remembered from the past and must be built into a model by the brain
-
Which idea would be least consistent with Gibson's direct theory?
- A person can see an object's layout from the information in the light reaching their eyes
- A person can judge the layout of a room using the patterns of light across the environment
- A person can perceive a scene directly, with the information picked up through innate abilities
- A person must build a model of the object from stored memories before they can see it
-
What does the phrase 'the real world presents sufficient information' mean in Gibson's theory?
- The environment contains information that is always too large for the short-term store to hold
- The environment contains enough structured information for perception to be direct
- The environment contains information only about colour and light, not about depth or movement
- The environment contains only partial information, so the brain must fill the gaps with memory
-
Gibson's theory is used to explain why perception is accurate in everyday life. Which reason fits?
- Because people rehearse what they see so that it is moved into long-term memory for later use
- Because the brain corrects each sensory error by building a new model of the scene in view
- Because people always check their perception against stored memories before they act at all
- Because the information in the environment is rich, so people can pick it up directly and act on it
-
Gibson's theory is a direct theory. What is the best contrast term for 'direct' in this sense?
- Indirect, meaning perception needs inference or processing beyond the information in the stimulus itself
- Serial, meaning perception processes each item in a fixed order one after the other in turn
- Stored, meaning perception relies on a copy of the input kept in the sensory store for a while
- Gradual, meaning perception improves slowly over time through rehearsal of what is seen
-
A climber judges whether a ledge can be reached by seeing how the rock surface is laid out. Which Gibson idea fits?
- The climber builds a model of the ledge from memory before deciding whether to reach for it
- The climber uses the serial order of the rock features to recall which part of the ledge is reachable
- The surface layout provides information that can be picked up directly to judge whether the ledge is reachable
- The climber rehearses the ledge's shape so that it can be moved into long-term memory store
-
A pilot uses the flow of runway lights as the aircraft moves to judge the landing. Which Gibson idea fits best?
- The pilot rehearses the lights so that they pass into the short-term store for the landing
- Information in the moving light pattern is picked up directly to guide the landing
- The pilot compares the lights with a stored model of runways before deciding how to land
- The pilot uses the serial order of the lights to recall where the runway is positioned
-
Which result would challenge Gibson's claim that perception needs no inference?
- Perception of an object being distorted by a misleading context, which suggests the brain makes an inference
- Perception of a moving object being equally accurate for near and far distances from the viewer
- Perception of an object being accurate in full daylight with a clear view of its surface
- Perception of a sound being identical whether the person is still or moving about in the room
-
Which everyday observation fits Gibson's claim that the environment is rich in information?
- A person can judge the slope of a hill only after recalling its height from a previous day
- A person can judge the slope of a hill only if they rehearse the hill's name aloud in their mind
- A person can judge the slope of a hill only by using the serial position of the hill in a list
- A person can judge the slope of a hill from the way the ground texture changes across the view
Related quizzes
- Difference between sensation and perception Quiz · 3.1.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Monocular depth cues: height in plane, relative size, occlusion, linear perspective Quiz · 3.1.2.2.1 · 20 questions
- Binocular depth cues: retinal disparity and convergence Quiz · 3.1.2.2.2 · 20 questions
- Role of motion parallax in everyday perception Quiz · 3.1.2.3.2 · 20 questions
- Illusion explanations: ambiguity, misread depth cues, fiction, size constancy Quiz · 3.1.2.4.1 · 20 questions
- Examples: Ponzo, Muller-Lyer, Rubin's vase, Ames Room, Kanizsa triangle, Necker cube Quiz · 3.1.2.4.2 · 20 questions
- Inference from visual cues and past experience to construct reality Quiz · 3.1.2.5.1 · 20 questions
- Perceptual set and the influence of culture, motivation, emotion and expectation Quiz · 3.1.2.6.1 · 20 questions
- Gilchrist and Nesberg study of motivation Quiz · 3.1.2.6.2 · 20 questions
- Bruner and Minturn study of perceptual set Quiz · 3.1.2.6.3 · 20 questions