Lesson 4.1.3.6
4.1.3.6 Science, theory and methods Quiz: AQA Sociology, Unit 1
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.1.3.6, Science, theory and methods: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Sociology (7192), Unit 1: Education with Theory and Methods, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
Which philosopher argued that scientific theories should be judged by whether they can be falsified by evidence?
- Auguste Comte, who argued that society passes through stages that can be identified by religious belief
- Max Weber, who argued that social science should seek understanding of meaning rather than causal laws
- Thomas Kuhn, who argued that science progresses through the accumulation of confirming observations
- Karl Popper, who argued that a theory is scientific if it makes claims that could in principle be shown to be false
-
Thomas Kuhn used which term to describe a shared framework of assumptions, methods and examples that guides normal scientific research?
- Paradigm, which is a shared framework that defines the accepted problems and methods of a scientific community
- Anomie, which is the breakdown of social norms that occurs when society undergoes rapid and disruptive change
- Hegemony, which is the dominance of the ideas of a ruling class over the consciousness of subordinate groups
- Verstehen, which is the understanding of social action from the point of view of the social actor
-
According to Kuhn, what happens when anomalies build up that a paradigm cannot explain?
- A scientific revolution may occur, in which an existing paradigm is replaced by a new one
- Scientists abandon empirical research entirely and return to philosophical speculation about nature
- The anomalies are always ignored, because scientists never question the accepted paradigm in any case
- The anomalies are resolved automatically by the passage of time, without any change in the framework
-
Which argument is most often made against the view that sociology can be a science in the same way as the natural sciences?
- Social phenomena are always simple and predictable, so no complex theories are needed in sociology
- Sociological data are always complete and objective, which removes any problems of measurement
- Social actors interpret and respond to research, which may change the very social patterns being studied
- Natural scientists have never used experiments, so sociology cannot be compared with the natural sciences
-
Which statement best describes the positivist view of scientific method?
- Knowledge is gained through the personal intuition of the researcher, which cannot be tested by others
- Knowledge is gained through the revelation of religious texts, which provide the ultimate source of truth
- Knowledge is gained through the systematic observation and measurement of phenomena, leading to general laws
- Knowledge is gained through the study of individual cases, which cannot be generalised to any wider context
-
Which sociologist is associated with the argument that social science should be value-free as far as possible?
- Max Weber, who argued that sociologists should distinguish between factual analysis and personal value judgements
- Erving Goffman, who argued that sociologists should study the dramatic performances of everyday life
- Karl Marx, who argued that the purpose of social science is to change society in the interests of the proletariat
- Louis Althusser, who argued that science is entirely determined by the ideology of the ruling class
-
Which statement about postmodernity is most accurate?
- Postmodern thinkers question grand narratives and the idea that a single, objective account of society is possible
- Postmodern thinkers argue that the modern era has ended, and that the Enlightenment has been fully vindicated
- Postmodern thinkers argue that social change has stopped, so sociology has nothing new to study in the future
- Postmodern thinkers argue that science has produced a single, universal truth that all societies accept
-
Which concept is associated with the view that the modern era is characterised by rationalisation, bureaucracy and the growing authority of science?
- Modernity, which emphasises rational organisation, scientific knowledge and progress in social life
- Ethnomethodology, which emphasises the everyday methods by which people produce social order
- Postmodernity, which emphasises the rejection of grand narratives and the plurality of perspectives
- Tradition, which emphasises customary practices and the authority of religion in everyday social life
-
Which argument would a sociologist use to challenge the claim that sociology can produce value-free knowledge?
- Researchers' data are always produced by machines, which removes any possibility of human bias
- Researchers' choices of topic, concepts and methods are shaped by their values and social position
- Researchers who study society must always be members of the ruling class, which prevents any objectivity
- Researchers who use statistics are unable to produce any findings at all about social life
-
Which evaluation of the view that sociology is a science is most consistent with sociological debate?
- Sociology is a science only if it studies biology, since all social behaviour is determined by biological instincts
- Sociology shares some features with science, such as systematic methods, but its subject matter is reflexive and complex
- Sociology is identical to natural science, because both use the same methods and produce the same types of laws
- Sociology cannot be a science in any sense, because social life has no regularities that could be studied
-
In Popper's philosophy, what does it mean to say that a theory has been corroborated?
- It has been confirmed only by the personal experience of the individual researcher who proposed it
- It has survived repeated serious attempts to falsify it, though it has not been proven true
- It has been proven true beyond any possible doubt by a single decisive experiment
- It has been accepted by a majority vote of the scientific community at an academic conference
-
Which statement about the relationship between theory and method in sociology is most accurate?
- Theory is only relevant after data are collected, because it has no influence on the design of the research
- Theory and method are entirely separate, so a researcher can choose any method regardless of the theory used
- Method is always more important than theory, so theoretical perspectives can be ignored in the research process
- Theory and method are linked, because the theoretical perspective shapes the questions asked and the methods used
-
Which criticism is most often made of the claim that sociology should adopt the methods of natural science?
- Natural science methods are always too cheap for sociologists to afford, so they are never used
- Human action involves meaning and interpretation, which natural science methods may not capture
- Natural science methods produce no data at all, so sociologists cannot learn anything from them
- Natural science methods can only be used in the laboratory, so they have no use in any field research
-
Which concept describes a claim that can be tested and shown to be false, which is central to Popper's view of scientific theory?
- Triangulation, which is the use of several methods to confirm the accuracy of a particular finding
- Reflexivity, which is the researcher's consideration of how their own position shapes the research
- Hermeneutics, which is the interpretation of texts in order to uncover meanings that are hidden
- Falsifiability, which is the property of a claim that could be proven wrong by empirical evidence
-
Which statement best describes the claim that scientific knowledge is socially constructed?
- Scientific knowledge is only a matter of religious faith, so it has no connection to evidence at all
- Scientific knowledge is shaped by social processes, such as the institutions, communities and interests involved in producing it
- Scientific knowledge is entirely independent of social processes, because it reflects an objective reality
- Scientific knowledge is always produced by individuals working alone, without any reference to other researchers
-
A sociologist argues that a theory cannot be tested if no evidence could ever show it to be wrong. Which philosophical position does this argument reflect?
- Weber's verstehen, which holds that social action must be understood from the actor's point of view
- Popper's falsificationism, which holds that testable claims must be capable of being refuted
- Parsons' functionalism, which holds that social systems must be understood in terms of their functional needs
- Blumer's symbolic interactionism, which holds that meanings are created through interaction between people
-
Which of the following best describes the difference between a grand narrative and a local explanation in postmodern thought?
- A grand narrative is always produced by ordinary people, while a local explanation is always produced by experts
- A grand narrative is always quantitative, while a local explanation is always qualitative in its methods
- A grand narrative is always false, while a local explanation is always true for every society in the world
- A grand narrative offers an all-encompassing account of history or society, while a local explanation applies to specific contexts
-
Which statement about Kuhn's view of scientific progress is most accurate?
- Progress occurs continuously and evenly, with each new discovery simply adding to the previous knowledge
- Progress does not occur at all, because science is always the same from one century to the next
- Progress occurs only when a single individual makes a discovery, without any community involvement
- Progress occurs through periods of normal science interrupted by revolutionary shifts in paradigm
-
Which claim is associated with Kuhn's view of normal science?
- Normal science involves puzzle-solving within an accepted paradigm, rather than testing the paradigm itself
- Normal science involves the abandonment of experiments in favour of philosophical reflection on nature
- Normal science involves constant challenges to every accepted theory, with no shared framework among researchers
- Normal science involves the rejection of all observation, because observation is always biased by theory
-
Which philosopher argued that scientific progress depends on the conjectures and refutations that scientists test against evidence?
- Auguste Comte, who argued that science advances through a fixed sequence of religious and metaphysical stages
- Louis Althusser, who argued that science advances only when it is aligned with the ideology of the working class
- Max Weber, who argued that social science advances by understanding the subjective meanings of social action
- Karl Popper, who argued that science advances by proposing bold conjectures and attempting to refute them
Related quizzes
- Role and functions of the education system Quiz · 4.1.1.1 · 20 questions
- Differential educational achievement by class, gender and ethnicity Quiz · 4.1.1.2 · 20 questions
- Relationships and processes within schools Quiz · 4.1.1.3 · 20 questions
- Educational policy, selection and marketisation Quiz · 4.1.1.4 · 20 questions
- Applying sociological research methods to education Quiz · 4.1.2.1 · 20 questions
- Quantitative and qualitative methods and research design Quiz · 4.1.3.1 · 20 questions
- Sources of data and primary and secondary data Quiz · 4.1.3.2 · 20 questions
- Positivism, interpretivism and social facts Quiz · 4.1.3.3 · 20 questions
- Considerations in choosing topic and methods Quiz · 4.1.3.4 · 20 questions
- Consensus, conflict, structural and social action theories Quiz · 4.1.3.5 · 20 questions