Lesson 4.2.3.T1
4.2.3.T1 Experimental method Quiz: AQA Psychology, Unit 2
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.2.3.T1, Experimental method: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Psychology (7182), Unit 2: Psychology in context, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
In a laboratory experiment, what is the main advantage over a field experiment?
- Greater ecological validity
- Participants are always unaware of the study
- Greater control over extraneous variables
- Results are always generalisable to the population
-
A field experiment is carried out in:
- A controlled laboratory with no manipulation, where the researcher only records what occurs
- A natural setting where the researcher still manipulates the independent variable
- A survey conducted by post with no variables, where people report their own opinions
- A location where the IV occurs naturally without any researcher involvement at all
-
A natural experiment is one in which:
- Participants are tested in a laboratory with full control over every extraneous variable
- The researcher randomly allocates participants to each condition in a controlled setting
- The independent variable occurs naturally and the researcher does not manipulate it
- The dependent variable is manipulated by the researcher, who changes its level directly
-
A quasi-experiment differs from a true experiment because:
- The dependent variable is not measured at all, so the outcome is recorded only as a note
- The independent variable is a pre-existing participant characteristic such as age or gender
- Participants are not tested in any condition, because the study is purely observational
- The researcher manipulates two independent variables at once, creating a factorial design
-
In an experiment, the dependent variable is:
- The variable that the researcher changes deliberately to create the different conditions
- The variable that is measured to see whether it is affected by the independent variable
- A variable that is kept constant across all conditions so it cannot influence the result
- The number of participants in each group, which is set in advance of the experiment
-
A key feature that distinguishes an experiment from a correlational study is that an experiment:
- Records behaviour without any intervention, so the researcher never changes anything
- Measures two variables without changing either one, simply recording how they vary
- Uses only self-report questionnaires that ask participants about their own habits
- Manipulates the independent variable to see its effect on the dependent variable
-
A laboratory experiment is typically criticised because it has:
- No measurable dependent variable, so the outcome cannot be compared across groups
- Low control over extraneous variables, which makes it hard to rule out confounds
- No independent variable at all, so the study cannot test any cause and effect link
- Low ecological validity, as the setting may not reflect everyday life
-
A researcher tests whether background noise affects recall. Participants are randomly allocated to noisy and quiet conditions in a lab. What type of experiment is this?
- Field experiment in a park
- Natural experiment in a city
- Laboratory experiment
- Quasi-experiment in a school
-
A researcher compares stress levels in people who lived through a flood with people who did not. What type of experiment is this?
- Field experiment with random allocation
- Natural experiment
- Repeated measures design in a lab
- Laboratory experiment
-
A researcher compares memory scores in men and women. What type of design is this?
- Field experiment with gender manipulated by the researcher in a natural setting
- Quasi-experiment, because gender is a pre-existing participant variable
- Natural experiment in which gender occurs naturally and the researcher observes it
- Laboratory experiment with random allocation of men and women to test conditions
-
A researcher increases the number of hours of revision (0, 2 and 4 hours) and measures the test score afterwards. Which is the dependent variable?
- The test score
- The number of hours of revision
- The amount of time between sessions
- The type of test
-
A researcher tests whether litter affects helping behaviour on a street, without participants knowing they are in a study. What type of experiment is this?
- Correlational study
- Laboratory experiment
- Quasi-experiment
- Field experiment
-
Why is a field experiment often preferred when a researcher wants high ecological validity?
- It takes place in a natural setting, so behaviour is more like everyday life
- It always uses random sampling from the whole national population, which guarantees representative results
- It allows the researcher to control every extraneous variable in the environment
- It eliminates the need for a dependent variable, since behaviour is only observed
-
Why are quasi-experiments limited in their ability to infer causation?
- Quasi-experiments always use a very large number of participants, which makes causal claims unreliable
- The IV is not manipulated or randomly assigned, so other differences between groups may explain the result
- Quasi-experiments do not require any control group, so the comparison between groups is never made
- The dependent variable cannot be measured in a quasi-experiment, so no comparison is possible at all
-
A natural experiment cannot use random allocation to conditions because:
- Natural experiments never have an independent variable, so they cannot test any cause and effect
- Random allocation is always forbidden by ethical guidelines in every type of psychological research
- The researcher does not control which participants experience the naturally occurring event
- Participants in natural experiments are always identical, so no allocation is needed for them
-
A critic points out that a study on students in a lab may lack population validity. What does this mean?
- The findings may not generalise to people beyond the students who took part
- The study measured the wrong dependent variable, so its results cannot be compared with others
- The experiment used too many conditions, which made the design too complicated to run
- The results are too precise to be meaningful for any group of people in the real world
-
Which feature distinguishes an experiment from a natural observation?
- The researcher interviews participants about their habits in a structured way
- The researcher systematically manipulates an independent variable
- The researcher studies only one participant in depth over a long period of time
- The researcher records behaviour without intervening, watching whatever happens naturally
-
In a lab experiment, a researcher uses a standardised script. What is the main purpose?
- To give participants a choice about which condition they experience, so they feel in control
- To increase the number of extraneous variables, so the design better reflects real-world complexity
- To ensure every participant receives the same instructions, which improves control and reliability
- To make participants believe that the study has a different aim from the real one under test
-
A researcher wants to show that a new teaching method causes better exam results. Which design is most appropriate for this aim?
- A controlled experiment with random allocation of students to the new and standard methods
- A content analysis of exam papers from several years, coded for the teaching style used
- A correlational study comparing schools that already use the new method with those that do not
- A case study of one exceptional student who improved greatly under the new teaching method
-
Evaluate the choice between a laboratory and a field experiment for a study of aggression in children. Which is the best justification for a field experiment?
- It requires no ethical approval because the behaviour is natural and therefore harmless
- It captures aggression in a natural setting, improving the realism of the findings
- It removes all extraneous variables from the study, so the results are entirely clean
- It guarantees that all children are equally aggressive, so there is no variation to explain
Related quizzes
- Learning approaches: behaviourism and classical conditioning Quiz · 4.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Operant conditioning and social learning theory Quiz · 4.2.1.2 · 20 questions
- The cognitive approach Quiz · 4.2.1.3 · 20 questions
- The biological approach Quiz · 4.2.1.4 · 20 questions
- The psychodynamic approach Quiz · 4.2.1.5 · 20 questions
- Humanistic psychology Quiz · 4.2.1.6 · 20 questions
- Comparison of approaches Quiz · 4.2.1.7 · 20 questions
- Divisions of the nervous system and neurons Quiz · 4.2.2.1 · 20 questions
- Synaptic transmission Quiz · 4.2.2.2 · 20 questions
- Endocrine system and fight or flight Quiz · 4.2.2.3 · 20 questions