Lesson 4.2.3.1.5
4.2.3.1.5 Ethics, peer review and the economic implications of research Quiz: AQA Psychology, Unit 2
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.2.3.1.5, Ethics, peer review and the economic implications of research: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Psychology (7182), Unit 2: Psychology in context, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
Informed consent means that participants:
- Must sign a contract agreeing to any procedure the researcher chooses to carry out
- Are told the exact hypothesis so they can predict the outcome before the study begins
- Are paid before the study begins, so they are committed to taking part fully
- Are given enough information about the study to decide whether to take part
-
The right to withdraw means that participants:
- Lose any payment they have been promised if they decide to leave the study early
- Can leave the study at any point, and can ask for their data to be removed
- Must complete the study once they have agreed to take part, whatever happens during it
- Can only withdraw after the results have been published, when their data are checked
-
Protection from harm in psychological research means that:
- Participants should not experience physical or psychological harm beyond what they would encounter in daily life
- Participants must always be exposed to some stress during the study, because real responses only appear under pressure in tests
- Harm is acceptable if the study is published in a major journal, since the findings then benefit society as a whole
- Only physical harm needs to be considered by researchers, because psychological effects of a study are too small to matter
-
Confidentiality in research means that:
- Participants' data are shared freely with the public, including their personal answers and details
- Participants are told each other's responses, so that everyone in the group can compare results
- Participants' names are published with their results so that the findings can be credited to them
- Participants' personal information is kept private and they are not identifiable in reports
-
Deception in research means:
- Participants are given false results to see how they respond to feedback about themselves
- Participants lie about their own answers on questionnaires, which the researcher then checks
- Participants are misled about the aim or procedure, which raises ethical concerns
- Participants are told the full aim before the study begins, so they can give informed consent
-
Debriefing is the process in which:
- Participants are instructed to keep the aim secret from others, so the study stays valid
- Participants are told the true aim of the study and any deception used after taking part
- Participants are asked to complete a further test before leaving, to measure their final mood
- Participants are told the results before they consent, so that they can decide to stay
-
Peer review in science is the process in which:
- The researcher reviews their own work for errors before the report is passed on
- Participants review the study to decide whether it is fair to the people who took part
- Experts in the field evaluate a study's quality before it is published
- A government department approves every study before it starts recruiting people at all
-
A researcher does not tell participants that they will watch a violent video. Which ethical concerns arise?
- Lack of a control group and a pilot study
- Deception and lack of informed consent
- Lack of confidentiality and the right to privacy only
- Lack of standardisation and random allocation
-
A participant becomes distressed during a study and the researcher stops the procedure. Which ethical principle is most directly applied?
- Standardisation and operationalisation of the key variables used
- Random allocation and counterbalancing of the conditions in design
- Peer review and publication of the findings in a journal
- The right to withdraw and protection from harm
-
A psychologist publishes a report that includes participants' full names and addresses. Which ethical principle is breached?
- Confidentiality
- The right to withdraw
- Informed consent
- Debriefing
-
A study on the effects of advertising influences how a company spends its marketing budget. What kind of implication is this?
- A sampling implication for the study design
- A reliability implication for the measurement tools
- An economic implication of psychological research
- An ethical implication for participant consent
-
Before a study can begin, researchers usually need approval from which body?
- The participants' employers
- A national lottery board
- An ethics committee
- The publisher of a journal
-
What is the main purpose of peer review in the scientific process?
- To ensure that the study is cheap to run, so that funding is kept as low as possible
- To select participants for the next study, from among those who did well in this one
- To check the quality of methods and conclusions before the findings are published
- To replace the need for statistical analysis, since reviewers judge the findings directly
-
A researcher pays participants a large fee, so that people in financial difficulty feel unable to refuse. What ethical issue does this raise?
- Confidentiality, because the payment reveals the names of participants to the funders
- Standardisation, because the payment changes the procedure that every person receives
- Coercion, because the payment may pressure people to take part against their judgement
- Reliability, because the payment changes the measure that the study uses to record data
-
Evaluate the economic implications of psychological research. Which point is most accurate?
- Research has no economic implications at all, because its findings are never used outside labs
- Research always reduces costs and never affects policy, since it only tests ideas in theory
- Research can inform policy and reduce costs, but funders may bias which questions are studied
- Economic implications only matter for laboratory studies, not for those carried out in the community
-
Why is debriefing required when deception has been used?
- So that participants understand the true aim and any distress caused by the deception can be addressed
- So that the participants can be paid for their time, which is the main purpose of the debrief session
- So that the researcher can change the data afterwards, once the participants have been informed of the aim
- So that the study can be repeated without ethical approval, since participants have now been told the aim
-
Explain how BPS guidelines reduce the risk of psychological harm in research.
- By requiring researchers to assess and minimise risks, and to protect participants from distress
- By guaranteeing that every study is published in a major journal, which then checks the safety of its methods
- By ensuring that every study uses deception to hide any harm from the participants involved
- By removing all participants who might feel stressed, so that the sample has no distressed people
-
A researcher argues that deception is justified because it produces more valid results. What is the main ethical counter-argument?
- Deception is legally required in every study, because the law demands misleading procedures
- Deception undermines informed consent and participants' trust, even when it improves validity
- Deception always produces invalid results, so it can never improve the quality of any study
- Deception has no effect on participants, so it carries no ethical risk for the people involved
-
A study offers extra course credit to students who take part. Which ethical concern is most relevant?
- Students may receive results that are too precise to be meaningful for their own studies
- Students may feel pressured to participate in order to gain credit
- Students' results may be published without permission, which is a privacy concern for them
- Students cannot be given any information about the study, so they cannot judge it fairly
-
Why do ethical guidelines require that participants are told they can withdraw at any time?
- To allow the researcher to keep data from those who leave, so that the sample is complete
- To increase the number of participants who stay until the end, to improve data quality
- To make sure the study finishes on time, so that the funding period is not exceeded
- To ensure that participation remains voluntary and that they are not pressured to continue
Related quizzes
- Learning approaches: behaviourism and classical conditioning Quiz · 4.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Operant conditioning and social learning theory Quiz · 4.2.1.2 · 20 questions
- The cognitive approach Quiz · 4.2.1.3 · 20 questions
- The biological approach Quiz · 4.2.1.4 · 20 questions
- The psychodynamic approach Quiz · 4.2.1.5 · 20 questions
- Humanistic psychology Quiz · 4.2.1.6 · 20 questions
- Comparison of approaches Quiz · 4.2.1.7 · 20 questions
- Divisions of the nervous system and neurons Quiz · 4.2.2.1 · 20 questions
- Synaptic transmission Quiz · 4.2.2.2 · 20 questions
- Endocrine system and fight or flight Quiz · 4.2.2.3 · 20 questions