Lesson 3.1.1.3.2
3.1.1.3.2 The Prime Minister and cabinet: responsibility and accountability Quiz: AQA Politics, Unit 1
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.1.1.3.2, The Prime Minister and cabinet: responsibility and accountability: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Politics (7152), Unit 1: Government and politics of the UK, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What is collective responsibility?
- The principle that all cabinet ministers publicly support government decisions, even if they disagreed in private
- The principle that ministers may publicly oppose government policy without consequence
- The principle that the cabinet must be approved by every MP in the Commons before it meets
- The principle that each minister is responsible only for their own department's spending
-
What is individual ministerial responsibility?
- A minister is personally responsible for all decisions made by the cabinet as a whole
- A minister is legally liable in court for every decision made by civil servants
- A minister is answerable to Parliament for the actions and errors of their department
- A minister cannot be questioned by Parliament about the policy of their own department
-
What was the significance of the resignation of Sir Thomas Dugdale in 1954?
- It is a well-known example of a Supreme Court judge being removed from office by ministers
- It is a well-known example of cabinet collective responsibility being abandoned for a whole cabinet
- It is a well-known example of a PM resigning after losing a vote in the House of Lords
- It is a well-known example of a minister resigning over a failure in their own department
-
Which example best illustrates the difference between individual and collective responsibility?
- A minister resigns to protest against a policy they helped to decide, without any departmental failure
- A minister is protected from resignation whenever a cabinet decision has been taken unanimously
- Every cabinet minister resigns immediately after any single departmental error is reported
- A minister resigns over their department's failure, while the rest of cabinet remains because the policy was agreed
-
Iain Duncan Smith resigned in 2016 over welfare reforms. What does this example show?
- A minister is automatically required to resign after any vote in the House of Lords
- A minister must resign whenever the Supreme Court rules a policy unlawful, without exception
- A minister may resign when they cannot publicly support a government policy they oppose
- A minister is protected from any resignation pressure once the policy has been approved by Parliament
-
What does accountability of the cabinet to Parliament mean in practice?
- Ministers can ignore questions in Parliament, as there is no sanction for failing to answer them
- Ministers must answer questions and defend policy in Parliament
- Ministers are accountable only to the courts, which can order them to publish all cabinet papers
- Ministers must seek the permission of the monarch before answering any question in the Commons
-
What is a key constraint on collective responsibility in practice?
- Ministers can publicly contradict each other without any effect on the government
- Ministers are legally required to vote against any policy they privately oppose
- Ministers cannot be dismissed by the PM, who must wait for a Commons vote
- Ministers sometimes resign
-
Which relationship between the PM and cabinet is most supported by the concept of accountability?
- The PM has no accountability because the cabinet is entirely made up of civil servants
- The PM and cabinet are answerable to Parliament, which can scrutinise decisions
- The PM is answerable only to the cabinet, which can overrule any decision in Parliament
- The PM is answerable only to the monarch, who must approve each cabinet decision in advance
-
Which statement best explains why individual responsibility can sometimes be avoided?
- Ministers are legally immune from criticism in Parliament when they hold office for more than a year
- Ministers always resign immediately after any failure, so there is never any doubt about responsibility
- Ministers may claim that departmental failures were the work of civil servants, which makes accountability harder to establish
- Ministers cannot be questioned by Parliament about their department because of statutory privilege
-
Which evaluation best supports the view that collective responsibility strengthens government?
- It presents a united front, so the government can deliver policy coherently even when ministers have private doubts
- It requires the cabinet to publish all of its private discussions for public review
- It prevents the PM from making any decision without the approval of the House of Lords
- It stops any minister from being questioned by Parliament about the policy of the government
-
Which argument best supports the view that collective responsibility weakens accountability?
- Ministers are required to publish every cabinet paper, which removes all secrecy from decisions
- Ministers must answer every question in Parliament, so collective decisions are always exposed
- Ministers can be dismissed by the Lords, so accountability is always strengthened by the cabinet
- Ministers can hide behind a collective decision, so individual ministers may avoid answering
-
Which example would be a test of government/parliament accountability relations?
- A committee passes a bill without debate because the government has a large majority
- A committee meets only in private and publishes no record of its proceedings
- A committee refuses to hear any evidence because the minister is a member of the cabinet
- A committee calls a minister to give evidence on a failed programme
-
Which statement about Parliament's ability to force a government to account is most accurate?
- Parliament can only hold ministers to account through the monarch, who decides the outcome
- Parliament can always remove the government at any time through a simple motion of censure
- Parliament has no ability to scrutinise the government because all decisions are made in private
- Parliament can scrutinise and vote against the government, but a majority can usually resist such pressure
-
A government minister is criticised for a poor policy outcome. Which response reflects individual responsibility?
- The minister insists the whole cabinet must resign, because all decisions are collective
- The minister publicly contradicts the PM to show that policy was never agreed
- The minister refuses to answer and argues that the cabinet is immune from questions
- The minister explains the failure in Parliament, accepts it is their department's responsibility and may resign
-
Why are the resignations of Dugdale and Duncan Smith useful for evaluating accountability?
- They show that collective responsibility has no role in modern UK government at all
- They prove that ministers are never held responsible for their actions under any circumstances
- They demonstrate that the Supreme Court can remove ministers from office for policy failures
- They show how responsibility can be enforced, but also how the difference between individual
-
Which combination best describes the cabinet's accountability to Parliament?
- It is collectively answerable through confidence votes
- It is answerable only to the monarch and to the Supreme Court, which decide its survival
- It is answerable only to the House of Lords, which must approve every cabinet decision
- It is not answerable to anyone, since ministers are appointed by the Prime Minister alone
-
Which judgement best assesses the strength of the accountability of PMs and ministers?
- Accountability is non-existent because the executive controls all parliamentary procedure
- Accountability is fixed by statute and cannot change regardless of the political situation
- Accountability is real but depends on the strength of the Commons
- Accountability is absolute because ministers can always be removed by the courts within days
-
What is the effect of collective responsibility on a minister who publicly opposes a government decision?
- They are automatically protected from any sanction, because the decision was collective
- They are required to become a member of the House of Lords for the rest of the term
- They are allowed to continue in office, because the Commons must approve every dismissal
- They may be expected to resign or be dismissed, because they cannot publicly support the policy
-
Which concept describes ministers answering to Parliament for their own department's errors?
- Collective cabinet responsibility
- Individual ministerial responsibility
- Judicial independence
- Parliamentary privilege
-
Which evaluation best supports the view that accountability is weakened when ministers blame civil servants?
- It has no effect on accountability, because civil servants are never criticised by ministers
- It allows ministers to avoid personal responsibility, which can make individual accountability harder to enforce
- It removes all the powers of Parliament, which can no longer question any minister
- It increases accountability, because civil servants are always named in Parliament for each error
Related quizzes
- The nature and sources of the British Constitution Quiz · 3.1.1.1 · 20 questions
- Parliament: scrutiny of the executive and legislation Quiz · 3.1.1.2.1 · 20 questions
- Parliament: representation and the influence of MPs and peers Quiz · 3.1.1.2.2 · 20 questions
- The Prime Minister and cabinet: policy making and power Quiz · 3.1.1.3.1 · 20 questions
- The judiciary Quiz · 3.1.1.4 · 20 questions
- Devolution Quiz · 3.1.1.5 · 20 questions
- Democracy and participation Quiz · 3.1.2.1 · 20 questions
- Elections: electoral systems in the UK Quiz · 3.1.2.2.1 · 20 questions
- Elections and referendums: key case-study elections and referendums Quiz · 3.1.2.2.2 · 20 questions
- Political parties Quiz · 3.1.2.3 · 20 questions