Lesson 3.1.1.3.1
3.1.1.3.1 The Prime Minister and cabinet: policy making and power Quiz: AQA Politics, Unit 1
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.1.1.3.1, The Prime Minister and cabinet: policy making and power: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Politics (7152), Unit 1: Government and politics of the UK, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What does the term primus inter pares mean when applied to the Prime Minister?
- Head of state, meaning the PM is the constitutional monarch's chief adviser
- First among equals, meaning the PM leads the cabinet but is formally one of its members
- Chief judge, meaning the PM sits as the final judicial authority in the UK
- Ruler over all, meaning the PM has unlimited power over cabinet decisions
-
What is the inner cabinet?
- The group of civil servants who advise the cabinet on routine administration
- A smaller group of senior ministers who take the most important decisions within the cabinet
- The ministers who are not members of the House of Commons or the House of Lords
- A committee of the Lords that reviews all cabinet appointments before they are confirmed
-
What are cabinet committees used for?
- Hearing appeals against decisions of the Supreme Court on constitutional issues
- Approving the Queen's Speech before it is read to Parliament each year
- Selecting the members of the House of Commons who will serve as ministers
- Detailed consideration of specific policy areas
-
Which term describes the central executive machinery around the PM, including Downing Street and the Cabinet Office?
- The legislative chamber
- The devolved administration
- The judicial committee
- The core executive
-
Which factor increases the PM's power over policy making?
- A House of Lords that is able to veto every decision taken by the PM
- A large parliamentary majority
- A divided cabinet in which every minister holds an independent power base
- A frequent need to seek agreement from the Supreme Court before acting
-
The poll tax was introduced in 1990. What does this example illustrate about the power of the PM and cabinet?
- The poll tax was decided by a national referendum before it was introduced
- The government could push through a controversial policy despite widespread opposition and later reverse it
- The cabinet had no ability to shape policy and was overruled by the Lords
- The PM was forced to resign immediately after it was proposed by ministers
-
The 2003 invasion of Iraq is used as an example of executive power. Which point best supports this?
- The PM and a small group of ministers took a decision that committed the UK to military action
- The invasion was approved by a national referendum held before the military action
- The cabinet was not involved at all and the decision was taken by the Supreme Court
- Parliament voted to refuse the invasion, and the government was forced to withdraw
-
Which factor is most important in determining how much influence the cabinet has over policy?
- The age of the monarch and their willingness to attend cabinet meetings
- The number of cabinet ministers who are members of the House of Lords
- The relationship between the PM and the cabinet
- The cabinet's legal authority to override decisions of the courts
-
Why is the PM's power sometimes described as 'presidential'?
- The PM is the head of state and commands the armed forces directly
- The PM can dominate the government and set the agenda, appearing more like a president than a first among equals
- The PM has the same legal powers as the US president, including a formal veto
- The PM is directly elected by the public in a national ballot every four years
-
Which argument best evaluates the view that the PM is dominant over the cabinet?
- Strong PMs often dominate, but cabinet opposition or a weak party position can constrain them, so dominance depends on circumstances
- Neither the PM nor the cabinet has any influence because policy is set by civil servants
- The cabinet is always dominant because the PM can be removed by any single minister
- The PM is always dominant because the cabinet has no formal powers of any kind
-
Which example best shows a PM using cabinet structures to manage policy making?
- Delegating a complex policy area to a cabinet committee
- Calling a referendum on every policy before any decision can be taken by the cabinet
- Asking the House of Lords to draft the cabinet's agenda for each weekly meeting
- Allowing the monarch to chair the cabinet meeting and set its agenda in advance
-
What is a limitation on the PM's power to dictate events?
- The PM must obtain written consent from every MP before any decision is made
- Major policy shifts can prompt cabinet resignations
- The PM can be legally removed by the Supreme Court if a single policy is unpopular
- The PM cannot make any decisions until the House of Lords has approved the agenda
-
A PM faces a cabinet split over a major policy. Which outcome best reflects the constraints described in the specification?
- The PM may need to compromise, drop the policy
- The House of Lords automatically decides the policy in favour of the cabinet majority
- The monarch takes over policy making until the cabinet reaches an agreed position
- The PM must immediately dismiss every minister who disagrees, as the law requires it
-
Which statement about the relationship between the PM and Parliament is most accurate?
- The PM is accountable only to the Supreme Court, which reviews all policy decisions
- The PM is accountable only to the monarch, who can dismiss the government at will
- The PM has no accountability because the government is directly elected by the public
- The PM is accountable to Parliament
-
Which judgement best assesses the effect of the Iraq and poll tax examples on the debate about PM power?
- They show that governments can impose major policies, but both also reveal limits when opposition
- They prove that the PM always controls policy and that cabinet opinion has no effect at all
- They show that only referendums can change policy, so PM power is largely irrelevant
- They prove that Parliament has no role in policy making and that civil servants decide everything
-
Which statement about the 1945 to 1997 and post-1997 periods is accurate for this specification?
- Students study only the 1997 general election, as it is the sole example of PM power
- Students must study one example of PM and cabinet power from each period to show change or continuity
- Students must study only examples from after 2010, because earlier cases are not in the specification
- Students study only the period before 1945, because later examples are not legally relevant
-
Which element best describes how policy is made at the centre of UK government?
- Policy is made entirely by local councils that then report to the Supreme Court
- Policy is made by a single national committee of the Commons that meets once a year
- The PM, cabinet, cabinet committees and departments jointly develop and approve policy
- Policy is made by the monarch alone after consultation with the Lords only
-
Why is the dominance of the PM and cabinet a concern for parliamentary government?
- It can weaken Parliament's ability to control the executive, especially when the government has a large majority
- It makes the courts responsible for drafting all of the government's policy decisions
- It requires the monarch to approve every decision before it takes effect in law
- It means Parliament is unable to pass any legislation at all, which is unconstitutional
-
Which evaluation best supports the claim that PM power is shaped by circumstances?
- Power depends only on the number of years the PM has served in office, which is set by law
- Power is determined by the monarch, who decides the scope of the PM's authority each year
- Power is fixed by statute and does not vary between different governments or periods
- Power depends on party majority, leadership popularity and events, so the same PM can be strong at one time and weak at another
-
Which example shows the executive's power to shape events by taking a decision that committed the nation?
- The 1911 Parliament Act, which reduced the delaying power of the Lords
- The 2003 invasion of Iraq, decided by the PM
- The 1954 resignation of Sir Thomas Dugdale over the Crichel Down affair
- The 2016 resignation of Iain Duncan Smith over welfare reform
Related quizzes
- The nature and sources of the British Constitution Quiz · 3.1.1.1 · 20 questions
- Parliament: scrutiny of the executive and legislation Quiz · 3.1.1.2.1 · 20 questions
- Parliament: representation and the influence of MPs and peers Quiz · 3.1.1.2.2 · 20 questions
- The Prime Minister and cabinet: responsibility and accountability Quiz · 3.1.1.3.2 · 20 questions
- The judiciary Quiz · 3.1.1.4 · 20 questions
- Devolution Quiz · 3.1.1.5 · 20 questions
- Democracy and participation Quiz · 3.1.2.1 · 20 questions
- Elections: electoral systems in the UK Quiz · 3.1.2.2.1 · 20 questions
- Elections and referendums: key case-study elections and referendums Quiz · 3.1.2.2.2 · 20 questions
- Political parties Quiz · 3.1.2.3 · 20 questions