Lesson 4.2.3.4
4.2.3.4 Possible conflicts between macroeconomic policy objectives Quiz: AQA Economics, Unit 2
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.2.3.4, Possible conflicts between macroeconomic policy objectives: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Economics (7136), Unit 2: The national and international economy, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What does the short-run Phillips curve show?
- A direct relationship between productivity and the price level
- A direct relationship between the money supply and the exchange rate, which shows that rising money supply always strengthens the currency
- An inverse relationship between the rate of inflation and the rate of unemployment
- A fixed rate of unemployment at every level of inflation
-
What is the shape of the long-run Phillips curve?
- Downward sloping, showing a trade-off at all times
- Upward sloping, showing that unemployment rises with inflation
- L-shaped, and vertical at the natural rate of unemployment
- Horizontal, showing inflation is always constant
-
Which name is also used for the long-run Phillips curve?
- The vertical long-run Phillips curve
- The upward sloping aggregate supply curve
- The horizontal short-run Phillips curve
- The downward sloping expectations curve
-
A negative output gap is most closely linked to which pair of outcomes?
- Lower inflationary pressure and higher unemployment
- Higher inflation and higher unemployment at the same time
- Lower inflation and lower unemployment at the same time
- Higher inflationary pressure and lower unemployment
-
A positive output gap is most closely linked to which pair of outcomes?
- Higher inflationary pressure and lower unemployment
- Lower inflation and higher productivity
- Higher unemployment and lower interest rates
- Lower inflationary pressure and higher unemployment
-
Which view argues that the major macroeconomic objectives are compatible in the long run?
- The view that unemployment can be permanently reduced by demand
- The monetarist and supply-side view
- The view that inflation must always rise with growth
- The Keynesian demand-management view in a recession
-
Which policy conflict arises when expansionary policy reduces unemployment but raises inflation?
- A trade-off between growth and the exchange rate in the long run
- A conflict between productivity and wage levels in all periods
- A conflict between the current account and the budget balance
- A trade-off between unemployment and inflation in the short run
-
Unemployment is 5 per cent with inflation at 2 per cent. Later unemployment is 4 per cent with inflation at 4 per cent. What does this movement illustrate?
- A fall in the natural rate of unemployment
- A movement along a short-run Phillips curve, with lower unemployment and higher inflation
- A rise in productivity that lowers inflation
- A shift of the long-run Phillips curve to the right, which means the natural rate of unemployment has risen permanently in the economy
-
An expansionary demand-side policy is used in the short run. Which outcome is most consistent with an AD/AS analysis?
- Unemployment and inflation both fall as output rises
- Unemployment falls and inflation rises as output moves above potential
- Unemployment and inflation both rise as SRAS moves left
- Unemployment rises and inflation falls as output moves below potential
-
The natural rate of unemployment is 5 per cent, and unemployment is held at 3 per cent by demand expansion. What is the likely long-run outcome?
- The economy stays at 3 per cent unemployment with stable inflation indefinitely
- Inflation accelerates as expectations adjust, because unemployment is below the natural rate
- Inflation falls steadily, because unemployment below the natural rate reduces costs
- Unemployment rises back to 3 per cent permanently and inflation stays constant, because expectations never change in the long run
-
A supply-side policy reduces the natural rate of unemployment. What does this do to the long-run Phillips curve?
- It shifts the long-run Phillips curve to the right, raising the natural rate
- It shifts the vertical long-run Phillips curve to the left, reducing the natural rate
- It makes the long-run Phillips curve downward sloping, offering a permanent trade-off
- It has no effect on the long-run Phillips curve
-
What is a key policy implication of the L-shaped long-run Phillips curve?
- Unemployment has no relationship with inflation at any time
- Demand management can permanently reduce unemployment to zero
- Demand management cannot permanently reduce unemployment below the natural rate
- Governments should always accept higher inflation to reduce unemployment, since the long-run cost of inflation is always small
-
The economy experiences rising unemployment and rising inflation at the same time. Which explanation is most consistent with this?
- A leftward shift of SRAS caused by cost-push pressures
- A fall in the money supply with a rise in productivity
- A fall in aggregate demand with a fall in costs
- A rightward shift of LRAS caused by technology
-
Which policy best reconciles unemployment and inflation objectives in the long run?
- Supply-side policies such as training that lower the natural rate of unemployment
- A permanent cut in interest rates to keep inflation rising
- A permanent increase in government spending to reduce unemployment, financed by borrowing that never needs to be repaid
- A fixed exchange rate that prevents any change in unemployment
-
An economy has unemployment of 6 per cent and inflation of 1 per cent. Which policy is most appropriate in the short run?
- A fall in the exchange rate, because it always reduces unemployment
- Expansionary demand-side policy, because inflation is low and unemployment is high
- A rise in the money supply only, with no change in taxes or spending
- Contractionary demand-side policy, because inflation is low and unemployment is high
-
Evaluate whether the conflict between policy objectives can be fully reconciled.
- Fully, because supply-side policies remove all trade-offs at once
- Not at all, because the long-run Phillips curve is downward sloping, so demand policy can lower unemployment without raising inflation
- Only partly, since supply-side measures can lower the natural rate but short-run trade-offs and time lags remain
- Fully, because demand policy has no effect on inflation at any time
-
Why might the short-run Phillips curve shift when inflation expectations change?
- Expectations affect only the exchange rate, not the Phillips curve
- Expected inflation has no effect on wage and price setting
- Workers and firms adjust wage and price setting to expected inflation, shifting the trade-off
- The curve shifts only when productivity changes in the long run, and expectations of inflation have no part in its position
-
What sequence best describes the effect of a rise in government spending in a recession, under the AD/AS model?
- Aggregate supply shifts right, prices fall and unemployment rises
- Aggregate supply shifts left, output rises and unemployment falls
- Aggregate demand shifts left, output falls and unemployment rises, with prices falling as firms cut their costs in response
- Aggregate demand shifts right, output rises and unemployment falls, with some upward pressure on prices
-
Which is the best evaluation of the monetarist view that objectives are compatible in the long run?
- It is entirely wrong, because there is no link between growth and unemployment
- It is irrelevant, because the Phillips curve has no role in policy and the trade-off between inflation and unemployment never changes
- It is always correct, because short-run trade-offs never exist
- It is useful, but it depends on the economy's ability to adjust, and short-run conflicts may last for years
-
A government wants lower unemployment without accelerating inflation. Which statement best explains why this is harder than it looks?
- The natural rate is always zero, so unemployment can be reduced without limit
- Pushing unemployment below the natural rate raises inflation over time as expectations adjust
- Inflation has no link with wages, so the policy has no costs
- Lower unemployment always reduces inflation, so the policy is easy to implement once the central bank has set a clear target
Related quizzes
- The objectives of government economic policy Quiz · 4.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Macroeconomic indicators Quiz · 4.2.1.2 · 20 questions
- Uses of index numbers Quiz · 4.2.1.3 · 20 questions
- Uses of national income data Quiz · 4.2.1.4 · 20 questions
- The circular flow of income Quiz · 4.2.2.1 · 20 questions
- Aggregate demand and aggregate supply analysis Quiz · 4.2.2.2 · 20 questions
- The determinants of aggregate demand Quiz · 4.2.2.3 · 20 questions
- Aggregate demand and the level of economic activity Quiz · 4.2.2.4 · 20 questions
- Determinants of short-run aggregate supply Quiz · 4.2.2.5 · 20 questions
- Determinants of long-run aggregate supply Quiz · 4.2.2.6 · 20 questions