Lesson 4.1.8.9

4.1.8.9 Government intervention in markets Quiz: AQA Economics, Unit 1

20 questions

In partnership with Revision Ninja

Lesson 4.1.8.9, Government intervention in markets: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Economics (7136), Unit 1: Individuals, firms, markets and market failure, written with Revision Ninja.

Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.

Host this setFree Play

The 20 questions

  1. Which is the main argument for government intervention in markets?

    • Intervention is needed only to raise tax revenue, since markets never fail to produce the quantity of goods that society wants.
    • The existence of market failure, in its various forms, can justify intervention to improve the allocation of resources.
    • Markets always allocate resources efficiently, so intervention is only ever needed to redistribute income between households.
    • Governments always allocate resources better than markets, because they have full information about every household's preferences.
  2. Which tool of intervention works through the government's own spending?

    • Price controls, which set a maximum or minimum price that firms may charge for goods and services in the market.
    • Indirect taxation, which raises the price of goods such as alcohol and tobacco paid by consumers in the market.
    • Public expenditure, such as the provision of schools, hospitals and roads funded from taxes.
    • The extension of property rights, which assigns ownership of resources such as pollution permits to firms or individuals.
  3. A government imposes an indirect tax on a good with a negative externality. What is the intended effect?

    • To lower the price of the good, which increases consumption so that the external cost is spread across more users.
    • To transfer income from consumers to producers, so that firms can afford to invest in cleaner production methods.
    • To increase the supply of the good, so that the market price falls and the good is more widely available to all.
    • To raise the price of the good, reducing consumption towards the level at which social cost equals social benefit.
  4. A subsidy is paid on a good with a positive externality. What is the intended effect?

    • To lower the price paid by consumers, increasing consumption towards the socially efficient level of the good.
    • To raise the price paid by consumers, which reduces consumption and so brings the market closer to its efficient level.
    • To remove the good from the market entirely, so that consumers receive only the substitute goods that have no externality.
    • To set a maximum price below equilibrium, so that suppliers reduce output and consumers pay less for the good in the market.
  5. Which is a disadvantage of a maximum price set below the equilibrium price?

    • Consumers reduce their demand to zero, because the lower price signals that the good is of low quality to them.
    • A shortage occurs, because quantity demanded exceeds quantity supplied at the controlled price in the market.
    • The equilibrium price rises, because the controlled price forces firms to increase the quantity they supply to buyers.
    • A surplus occurs, because quantity supplied exceeds quantity demanded at the controlled price in the market.
  6. Which policy would extend property rights to correct an externality?

    • Banning the trade of all permits, so that every firm must reduce its pollution to zero without any flexibility.
    • Removing all ownership rights from firms, so that no firm can own any resource or asset in the economy.
    • Allowing firms to pollute freely while the government pays a subsidy for each tonne of pollution they emit.
    • Assigning tradable pollution permits, so that firms must hold a permit for each unit of pollution they emit.
  7. Which is an example of regulation used to correct market failure?

    • A decision by the central bank to lower the base rate of interest, which affects the monetary conditions of the economy.
    • A cut in income tax for all workers, which raises their disposable income but does not affect any market directly.
    • Health and safety standards that require firms to meet minimum requirements for the products they sell to consumers.
    • A rise in government borrowing to fund a programme of road building, which affects the level of public debt only.
  8. Which objective most likely explains a government's decision to intervene in the housing market?

    • Ensuring access to affordable housing for low-income households, which the market may fail to provide at an acceptable price.
    • Increasing the rate of return on investment in property for the wealthiest households, which the market already provides.
    • Raising the price of housing for all buyers, so that the government earns more revenue from property transactions at the time in question.
    • Reducing the number of households in the economy, so that the demand for housing falls to a level set by the state.
  9. Why might a government use a range of policies rather than a single intervention?

    • Different market failures and objectives may need different tools, such as taxes for externalities and regulation for safety.
    • Multiple policies are always required by law, so the government has no choice in the tools used in any market at the time in question.
    • Multiple policies reduce all market failure to zero, because each policy completely removes the need for the others.
    • A single intervention always solves every market failure, so using several policies only adds cost without any benefit.
  10. Which policy best describes the use of a price control to protect consumers?

    • A subsidy given to firms that raises their profit margins, so consumers pay the full market price for the good in each year.
    • A maximum price set by government, which caps the price a firm may charge for an essential good or service.
    • A minimum price set by government, which guarantees that consumers can always buy the good at a price below equilibrium.
    • A tax imposed on consumers of the good, which lowers the price they pay for each unit that they buy in the market.
  11. Which is a likely benefit of public provision of a good that the market under-provides?

    • Greater market power for the state, which allows it to exclude private firms from supplying any substitutes at all.
    • Greater availability of the good to all, including those who would not buy it at the market price in the economy.
    • Reduced output of the good, because public provision always lowers the quantity supplied to a level below the market.
    • Higher prices for the good, since the government always sets prices above the marginal cost of supply in every case.
  12. Which evaluation best challenges the case for government intervention?

    • Intervention never has any unintended consequences, because policies always work exactly as the government plans in every case.
    • Intervention is unnecessary, because markets always self-correct without any change to prices or behaviour in the economy.
    • Intervention always improves welfare, because the government has perfect information about the preferences of every citizen.
    • Intervention can also misallocate resources, so its costs and benefits must be compared with the market failure it is meant to correct.
  13. A government uses a tax to correct a negative externality. Which factor determines the appropriate level of the tax?

    • The number of consumers of the good, regardless of the external cost created by each unit they consume in the market.
    • The size of the external cost per unit, so that the private cost is raised to the level of the social cost.
    • The total revenue the government wishes to raise, regardless of the size of any external cost imposed by the good.
    • The current exchange rate, which determines the price of imported inputs used to make the good in the economy.
  14. Which is the best description of a government's trade-off when intervening in a market?

    • Intervention has no trade-off, because the objectives of efficiency and equity always move together in every market.
    • Intervention only affects firms and never has any impact on consumers, workers or the wider economy at any time.
    • Intervention always reduces costs for everyone, because the government pays for all of its policies from the state's own funds.
    • Intervention may improve efficiency or equity but can impose costs, such as reduced incentives or administrative expense.
  15. Which is the most accurate statement about the effects of price controls?

    • Price controls always increase the supply of goods in the market, because firms are willing to produce more at any fixed price.
    • Price controls never change the quantity supplied or demanded, because the market quantity is fixed by the state in every case.
    • Price controls can create shortages or surpluses, because the controlled price differs from the equilibrium price set by the market.
    • Price controls always eliminate shortages, because the government has the power to force suppliers to meet all demand.
  16. A government intervenes in a market with an external cost. Which policy most directly internalises the externality?

    • A subsidy set equal to the marginal external cost, so that producers are paid for the damage their output causes.
    • A Pigouvian style tax set equal to the marginal external cost, so that producers pay for the damage their output causes.
    • A maximum price set equal to the marginal external cost, so that producers are not allowed to charge the full cost.
    • A ban on the sale of all goods that have any external cost, so that consumers buy only goods that are free of externalities.
  17. Which is a likely drawback of a minimum price set above equilibrium for an agricultural good?

    • No change in the quantity bought, because a minimum price has no effect on the balance of supply and demand.
    • A shortage of the good, because the minimum price reduces the quantity demanded by consumers across the market.
    • A fall in the price received by farmers, because the minimum price always sets prices below the market equilibrium.
    • A surplus of the good, which may need to be bought up or stored by the government at public expense.
  18. Why might a government regulate a monopoly rather than rely only on a tax?

    • Regulation always raises the profit of monopolists, so governments use it to increase their tax revenue in the economy.
    • A tax always lowers the monopolist's price to the level of marginal cost, so regulation is never necessary in any market.
    • A tax removes the monopolist's market power entirely, so regulation is needed only where taxes are not collected in full.
    • Regulation can directly limit the price or output of the monopolist to protect consumers, which a tax may not achieve.
  19. A government sets an indirect tax on a good with a negative externality. Why might the tax not fully correct the externality?

    • The tax is never paid by consumers, because the entire burden always falls on the producer in every market in the economy.
    • The tax always equals the external cost automatically, because the market reveals the exact size of the externality to the government.
    • The tax removes the externality completely, so the question of setting its level never arises for the government in practice.
    • The external cost per unit may be hard to measure, so the tax may be set above or below the level needed to correct the externality.
  20. Which statement about a subsidy for a merit good is most accurate?

    • It removes the need for government spending, because subsidies replace all public expenditure on the merit good over the period concerned.
    • It can increase consumption of the merit good, but it may cost the government money and must be funded through taxation.
    • It reduces consumption, because a subsidy raises the price paid by consumers for each unit of the merit good they buy.
    • It has no fiscal cost, because subsidies are always paid by the firms that receive them in every case in the economy.

All AQA Economics quizzes