Lesson 4.1.8.7
4.1.8.7 Competition policy Quiz: AQA Economics, Unit 1
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.1.8.7, Competition policy: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Economics (7136), Unit 1: Individuals, firms, markets and market failure, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
The main purpose of UK competition policy is to:
- Encourage firms to merge into larger units so that each market contains only one supplier in the long run.
- Protect domestic firms from all foreign competition by setting tariffs on imported goods and services in every market.
- Guarantee that every firm in each market earns the same level of profit regardless of its efficiency or its size in the market.
- Prevent firms from restricting competition, such as through cartels or abuse of a dominant position, in order to protect consumer welfare.
-
Which body is the principal UK competition authority?
- The Office for Budget Responsibility, which produces forecasts of public borrowing and the performance of the economy.
- The Bank of England, which sets interest rates and supervises the banks operating in the economy as a whole.
- The Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates the conduct of firms in the financial services sector and no others.
- The Competition and Markets Authority, which investigates mergers and anti-competitive practices across the economy.
-
Why is a cartel a target of competition policy?
- A cartel fixes prices or restricts output among firms, which reduces competition and harms consumers through higher prices.
- A cartel is a government body that sets maximum prices for goods in regulated industries across the whole economy.
- A cartel increases competition by sharing information among firms, which lowers prices and raises output in the market.
- A cartel is a legal agreement to share research, which always raises productivity and lowers costs for consumers in the market.
-
Which practice would most likely fall under the abuse of a dominant position?
- A firm investing heavily in new equipment to raise its output and lower its unit costs over the long term in the market.
- A small firm lowering its prices to attract customers from a rival that has a similar market share in the industry.
- A firm offering a loyalty discount to customers who buy a new product that it has just launched in the market.
- A dominant firm selling below cost to drive a rival out of the market, then raising prices once the rival has exited.
-
What is the main reason competition authorities scrutinise mergers?
- A merger always lowers costs and so the authority must approve every merger to raise total output across the economy.
- A merger may reduce competition and raise prices, so the authority assesses whether it is likely to harm consumers.
- A merger always creates a monopoly, so the authority must block every merger that involves two firms in any market.
- A merger reduces the number of firms in a market, so the authority must ensure the merged firm pays a higher rate of tax.
-
Which is a possible cost of competition policy?
- Competition policy always raises prices, because it prevents firms from competing on price in every market in the economy.
- Competition policy increases the market power of dominant firms, because it protects their profit margins from rivals in the market.
- Competition policy reduces consumer choice, because it allows only one firm to supply each good in the economy as a whole.
- Investigations are costly, and blocking mergers may prevent efficiencies such as economies of scale that would lower costs.
-
Which is a benefit of competition policy?
- Lower prices and greater choice for consumers, as firms compete more vigorously for their custom in the market.
- Reduced innovation, because firms that face competition have no incentive to improve their products over time.
- Higher prices and fewer products, as firms agree to share the market and avoid costly competition with each other.
- Greater dominance by the largest firms, as the policy protects them from smaller rivals entering the market over time.
-
Which EU rules prohibit anti-competitive agreements and the abuse of a dominant position within member states?
- The EU's rules on the free movement of workers, which allow citizens to take up employment in other member states.
- The Common Agricultural Policy rules, which set minimum prices for farm products traded across the member states.
- The European Central Bank's mandate to maintain price stability across the euro area over the medium term.
- Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
-
Two firms with market shares of 60 per cent and 25 per cent propose to merge. Which concern is most relevant?
- The combined 85 per cent share may enable the merged firm to raise prices, so the authority would examine the effect on competition.
- A combined share of 85 per cent always guarantees efficiency, so the authority should approve the merger without any examination.
- The combined firm must reduce its output to 60 per cent by law, so the merger always lowers total output automatically.
- The merged firm will have a lower share than before, so no competition concern arises for consumers in this market at all.
-
A dominant firm has a 70 per cent market share. Which action would competition policy most likely examine?
- Reducing its prices in response to a fall in the cost of raw materials that it buys from its suppliers in the market.
- Investing in a new factory that increases its capacity and lowers unit costs for all of its customers in the market.
- Refusing to supply a key input to a rival that competes with it in the downstream market for the final product.
- Publishing its annual accounts in full so that customers can compare its prices with those of rival firms in the market.
-
Which evaluation best assesses the effectiveness of competition policy?
- Competition policy is unnecessary, because markets always remove market power over time without any intervention at all.
- Competition policy is never effective, because firms always find ways to avoid competition laws in every market in the economy.
- Its effectiveness depends on enforcement and on weighing lower prices and innovation against possible losses from scale economies.
- Competition policy is always effective, because the number of firms in any market is the only factor that matters for welfare.
-
Which is the best description of a cartel?
- A government-owned firm that provides a public service at a price set below the cost of production each year in the economy.
- A merger between two firms in different industries that combine to diversify the risks of the products they sell in the market.
- A group of consumers who agree to buy only from certain firms in order to lower the prices they pay in the market.
- An agreement between firms to fix prices, share markets or restrict output so that they act together like a single monopolist.
-
In competition terms, what does it mean for a firm to be dominant?
- It holds a large market share and can influence price and output without facing significant competition from rival firms.
- It holds a patent for a product, so that no other firm can ever enter the market for any reason at any time in the case described.
- It is subsidised by the state so that it can sell its products below the cost of production each year in the economy.
- It is the largest firm by employment, but holds a very small share of the market for its own product in the economy.
-
Four firms have market shares of 40, 30, 20 and 10 per cent. If the two largest firms merge, what is the merged firm's market share?
- 70 per cent, being the sum of the 40 per cent and 30 per cent shares of the two merging firms.
- 40 per cent, since the merged firm keeps the share of the larger firm only, and the smaller firm exits the market entirely.
- 35 per cent, since the combined share is averaged between the two firms that merge in the market over the period.
- 80 per cent, since the merged firm's share is the sum of the 40, 30 and 10 per cent shares of the three largest firms.
-
Why might a competition authority allow a merger that reduces the number of firms in a market?
- Authorities must allow every merger, because the law forbids them from examining any merger in the economy at any time.
- Mergers always increase competition, because the merged firm has more resources to compete against new entrants in the market.
- Mergers never affect prices, so the authority has no reason to examine their effect on consumers in the market at all.
- The merger may generate efficiencies, such as lower costs passed on to consumers, which may outweigh the loss of competition.
-
Which statement about the Competition Act 1998 is most accurate?
- It requires all firms to publish their prices online so that consumers can compare them in every market across the UK.
- It sets the national minimum wage and regulates the pay of workers in firms with large market shares in the economy.
- It prohibits anti-competitive agreements and the abuse of a dominant position within the UK economy.
- It gives the Bank of England power to set interest rates independently of the government's economic policy objectives.
-
Which point weakens the case for strict competition policy in a natural monopoly?
- In a natural monopoly many firms can supply the good at lower cost than a single firm, so splitting it always helps consumers.
- In a natural monopoly competition always lowers costs, so no regulation is ever needed in any industry of the economy.
- In a natural monopoly one firm may be the lowest-cost supplier, so splitting it into rivals could raise costs for consumers.
- In a natural monopoly entry by rivals is easy, so the monopoly cannot sustain any price above its marginal cost in the market.
-
Competition policy in the UK relies mainly on which approach?
- Fixed price controls set by the government for every firm in every industry across the whole economy at all times in the case described.
- Investigating specific cases of anti-competitive behaviour and mergers, judged on their likely effects on competition and consumers.
- Public ownership of all firms with a market share above 10 per cent, so that competition is replaced by state control.
- Automatic approval of all mergers, so that firms can grow freely without any examination by the competition authority.
-
A firm is found to have fixed prices jointly with a rival. What is the likely outcome?
- No penalty, because firms that fix prices always increase total welfare by stabilising the market price for consumers.
- A fine and an order to stop the anti-competitive conduct, as the authority can impose sanctions on the firms involved.
- A reward in the form of a subsidy paid by the government to the firms, to encourage stable pricing across the market.
- Immediate nationalisation of both firms, so that the government sets prices for all the goods they produce in future.
-
When assessing a merger, which reasoning is most accurate?
- The authority blocks any merger that increases firm size, since bigness is always a sign of anti-competitive behaviour.
- The authority ignores efficiency gains entirely, because only the number of firms in a market affects consumer welfare.
- The authority approves any merger that increases the firm's profit, since higher profit always reflects greater efficiency.
- The authority weighs the likely rise in market power against any efficiency gains, judging whether consumers are harmed overall.
Related quizzes
- Economic methodology Quiz · 4.1.1.1 · 20 questions
- The nature and purpose of economic activity Quiz · 4.1.1.2 · 20 questions
- Economic resources Quiz · 4.1.1.3 · 20 questions
- Scarcity, choice and the allocation of resources Quiz · 4.1.1.4 · 20 questions
- Production possibility diagrams Quiz · 4.1.1.5 · 20 questions
- Consumer behaviour Quiz · 4.1.2.1 · 20 questions
- Imperfect information Quiz · 4.1.2.2 · 20 questions
- Aspects of behavioural economic theory Quiz · 4.1.2.3 · 20 questions
- Behavioural economics and economic policy Quiz · 4.1.2.4 · 20 questions
- The determinants of the demand for goods and services Quiz · 4.1.3.1 · 20 questions