Lesson 3.1.5.7
3.1.5.7 Hazards: case studies Quiz: AQA Geography, Unit 1
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.1.5.7, Hazards: case studies: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Geography (7037), Unit 1: Physical geography, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
A case study of a multi-hazardous environment is most useful for showing:
- That all hazards have identical impacts everywhere, so the same management strategy works in every region
- That only one hazard ever affects a region at a time, so planning can focus on a single threat
- That hazards never affect people who choose to live close to them, because they learn to avoid danger
- How several hazards interact and how human responses such as resilience and adaptation affect continuing occupation
-
In a local-scale hazard case study, which analysis best links the physical hazard to the community?
- Describing the colour of local buildings and the materials used in their construction over several decades
- Listing the global population of the country in which the community is located, with census figures
- Measuring only the depth of the nearest river and comparing it with the depth recorded in previous years
- Explaining how the economic, social and political character of the community reflects the hazard and its response
-
Which criterion is most important when evaluating a hazard response in a case study?
- Whether it was adopted in a neighbouring country first, so that it can be copied elsewhere quickly
- Whether it reduces impacts and how it affects the community's capacity to recover
- Whether it is shown in a national newspaper or broadcast on television to a wide audience at the time
- Whether it is the most expensive option available to the government when it was first proposed
-
Which term describes a community's ability to recover quickly from a hazard event?
- Distribution, the spatial pattern of where a hazard is located across the landscape in the study area
- Resilience, the capacity of a community to absorb shocks, adapt and recover
- Frequency, the number of times a given type of hazard event occurs in a region over a fixed period
- Magnitude, the size of the physical event as measured by the energy it releases at its source
-
Which factor is most likely to affect how a community responds to a hazard in a case study?
- The colour of its local shops, which can indicate how prosperous the community has been in recent years
- Its economic resources, governance and social networks
- The average height of its buildings, which determines how much shaking they can withstand in an earthquake
- The number of tourists visiting the area in the summer, which affects how much warning people receive
-
Which is the most appropriate way to use quantitative data in a hazard case study?
- To replace all qualitative evidence with a single number that summarises the whole experience of the community
- To show trends in losses, frequency or population exposure over time
- To describe only the colour of the landscape and the vegetation cover visible on satellite images
- To avoid any reference to the community's experience, focusing only on the physical characteristics of the hazard
-
Which feature suggests a community is adapting to a hazard rather than only responding to it?
- A single emergency evacuation with no follow-up, after which the community returns to its normal routines
- Donations collected once after a disaster, which are spent on immediate needs and not reinvested
- Long-term changes such as building codes and land-use planning introduced to reduce future risk
- Temporary relief supplies distributed for one week, which are then withdrawn as the emergency ends
-
Which of these is an example of mitigation within a hazard case study?
- Distributing food after a flood has passed, supplying families who lost their stored food and income
- Counselling families who lost homes in a flood, helping them cope with the emotional impact of the event
- Constructing flood defences that reduce the scale of flooding in the community
- Recording the number of flood victims for the official record, so that the scale of the disaster is known
-
Which statement best evaluates the claim that a hazard is a purely environmental problem?
- Hazard impacts reflect the interaction of physical events with social, economic and political conditions in the community
- Hazard impacts depend only on the physical event, with no role for social or economic factors in the outcome
- Hazards never affect the economy of a community, since economic activity continues regardless of the event
- Hazards are environmental only if they occur in rural areas, while urban hazards are classed as social problems
-
Which secondary impact of a hazard would be most relevant in a case study of a community after a major event?
- Loss of livelihoods when farms or businesses are destroyed and cannot reopen for many months
- Direct heat from the hazard's central core, which affects residents close to the event
- Immediate formation of the hazard itself, which occurs at the moment the physical event begins
- Immediate burial of the community's buildings under debris as the physical event strikes the settlement
-
A case study identifies a community with high exposure and low economic resources. Which outcome is most likely?
- Greater vulnerability and slower recovery than a wealthier community facing the same hazard
- Less vulnerability because the community has fewer assets that could be damaged by the hazard event
- Faster recovery because its buildings are cheaper to replace and its residents have fewer possessions to lose
- No impact from the hazard because the community is poor and therefore not located in hazardous areas
-
Which statement about the use of case studies in hazard geography is most accurate?
- They prove that all hazards behave in exactly the same way everywhere, so the same management plan can be copied
- They show that human responses never change, since communities always respond to hazards in the same manner
- They replace the need for any general theory, since each case study is unique and cannot be generalised
- They allow general principles about hazards to be tested against specific places and people
-
Which response best reflects the Park model of human response to hazards in a case study?
- A community ranging from fatalism to management and risk sharing over time
- A community that always responds in exactly the same way to every hazard event it experiences over time
- A community that uses only prediction and no other form of response to hazard events in the region
- A community that ignores hazards entirely and makes no attempt to plan for or reduce their potential impacts
-
A community hit by two hazards in quick succession suffers greater losses than from either alone. Which concept best describes this?
- Hazard perception, the way people understand and feel about the risk of hazards in their community
- Risk sharing, the spreading of financial losses across many people through insurance or pooled funds
- Compound or cascading hazard impacts, where combined effects produce losses greater than either event alone
- Hazard magnitude, the energy released by a single physical event measured at its source
-
Which data source is most appropriate for investigating changes in hazard vulnerability over time in a local community?
- Only the community's social media posts from one week, which reflect the views of a small group
- Only the regional weather forecast for tomorrow, which gives short-term information on conditions
- Census data and records of past events, combined with local interviews
- Only satellite images taken in a single year, which show the community at one point in time
-
Which feature of a community is most likely to reduce its vulnerability to a hazard?
- Dense settlement on a flood-prone floodplain, which concentrates people and property close to the hazard
- Absence of any local government or organisations, so that decisions are made by individuals acting alone
- Reliance on a single source of income, which keeps the community focused on one economic activity
- Effective early warning, enforced building standards and strong local organisations
-
Which conclusion is best supported by a comparison of two contrasting places facing the same hazard?
- The physical event always causes identical impacts everywhere, regardless of the economic or political conditions
- Differences in economic capacity and governance can produce very different impacts from the same physical event
- Governance has no effect on impacts from hazards, which depend entirely on how strongly the physical event occurs
- Economic capacity only affects tourism in each place, and has no bearing on how hazards are managed or recovered from
-
Which is an example of a long-term adaptation to flood hazard in a case study?
- Relocating new development out of the floodplain and changing land-use zoning
- Holding an emergency meeting after the water has receded to discuss the response to the flood
- Pumping floodwater out of homes on the day of the flood, using pumps brought in by emergency services
- Distributing blankets in the week after flooding, providing immediate warmth to affected residents
-
Which claim about the local versus contrasting place in a case study is most defensible?
- Local and distant places always have identical hazard risks, so comparison adds nothing to the analysis
- Distant places are irrelevant to understanding local hazard risk, since each place must be studied in isolation
- Comparing a local community with a distant contrasting place can reveal how economic and political conditions shape hazard impacts
- Local communities are never affected by distant events, so global connections have no role in local hazard outcomes
-
Which statement about the role of resilience in a multi-hazardous environment is most accurate?
- Resilience applies only to ecosystems and not to people, since human communities cannot adapt to hazards
- Resilience is irrelevant once a hazard has passed, since the community then returns to its original state automatically
- Resilience helps communities absorb repeated hazards and continue to occupy the area
- Resilience means that a community never experiences losses, so the impact of hazards is avoided entirely over time
Related quizzes
- Water and carbon cycles as natural systems Quiz · 3.1.1.1 · 20 questions
- The water cycle Quiz · 3.1.1.2 · 20 questions
- The carbon cycle Quiz · 3.1.1.3 · 20 questions
- Water, carbon, climate and life on Earth Quiz · 3.1.1.4 · 20 questions
- Water and carbon cycles: quantitative and qualitative skills Quiz · 3.1.1.5 · 20 questions
- Water and carbon cycles: case studies Quiz · 3.1.1.6 · 20 questions
- Deserts as natural systems Quiz · 3.1.2.1 · 20 questions
- Hot desert systems and processes Quiz · 3.1.2.2 · 20 questions
- Arid landscape development in contrasting settings Quiz · 3.1.2.3 · 20 questions
- Desertification Quiz · 3.1.2.4 · 20 questions