Lesson 3.4.6
3.4.6 Monopsony Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Economics A, Unit 3
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.4.6, Monopsony: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Economics A (9EC0), Unit 3: Theme 3: Business behaviour and the labour market, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
A monopsony is best described as a market with:
- A single buyer of a factor input, such as labour in a company town
- A market where government sets all wages for every worker
- A single seller of a final product to many buyers
- Many small buyers competing for the same factor input
-
Which conditions allow a monopsony to operate?
- A perfectly elastic supply of labour at the market wage
- Many buyers competing vigorously for the same workers
- Free movement of workers between all regions and occupations
- A single or dominant buyer, high barriers to entry for other buyers, and an upward sloping labour supply
-
A monopsonist typically pays a wage:
- Equal to zero for all workers in the market
- Equal to the marginal revenue product of labour
- Equal to marginal cost of labour for every worker
- Below the marginal revenue product of labour
-
Marginal factor cost (MFC) under monopsony is:
- The extra cost of hiring one more worker, which exceeds the wage because all existing workers must also be paid the higher wage
- The wage, which is equal to MFC at every level of hiring
- Falling as more workers are hired by the monopsonist
- Zero for the first worker and falling for each worker after
-
What is the typical effect of monopsony on workers?
- Higher wages and higher employment than in a competitive market
- Wages equal to the competitive level with no change in employment
- Lower wages and lower employment than in a competitive market
- Unlimited employment at any wage the workers choose
-
Labour supply is W = 4 + 0.5L, so total labour cost is 4L + 0.5L^2 and MFC = 4 + L. If MRP is £20, what wage does the monopsonist pay?
- £16
- £8
- £12
- £20
-
A benefit of monopsony to the employer is:
- Lower profit than under competition in the same market
- Stronger bargaining by a union of workers
- A lower wage bill and higher profit per worker
- Higher wages for workers in the market
-
Which policy counters the power of a monopsonist?
- A tax on labour supply paid by all workers in the market
- A subsidy paid only to monopsonist employers
- A national minimum wage set at or near the competitive level
- Abolition of all minimum wage rules across the economy
-
Why might a monopsonist employ fewer workers than a competitive market?
- It pays the highest wage in the market to attract workers
- It restricts hiring to keep the wage low, so employment is below the competitive level
- It always hires more workers than competitive employers do
- It sets employment at full capacity regardless of wages
-
Which is a realistic example of monopsony in the UK?
- Retail chains competing nationally for the same staff
- Many small employers of cleaners competing in one city
- A market with thousands of employers competing for the same workers
- A single major employer dominating local jobs, such as a large mine or hospital in a remote area
-
Monopsony tends to reduce:
- Employees' earnings above the competitive level in every case
- Competition between employers for workers in the market
- The number of employers in the local labour market
- Supplier welfare and employees' earnings compared with competitive outcomes
-
How does monopsony differ from monopoly?
- The two terms describe exactly the same market structure
- Monopsony applies only to goods markets and not to labour
- Monopsony is a single buyer in a factor market, whereas monopoly is a single seller in a product market
- Monopsony is a single seller in a product market for goods
-
Why does marginal factor cost lie above the labour supply curve under monopsony?
- Labour supply is perfectly elastic at the monopsony wage
- Each worker has a fixed wage that never changes with hiring
- The marginal revenue product of labour is always zero
- Hiring an extra worker raises the wage paid to all existing workers as well
-
Which group benefits most from monopsony?
- Consumers of the product, who pay lower prices
- Other employers who enter the market to hire workers
- Workers in the market, who earn more
- The monopsonist employer, through a lower wage bill
-
Evaluate: should government intervene in a monopsony labour market?
- No, because labour markets are always competitive in practice
- Possibly: a minimum wage can raise wages and employment towards the competitive level, but set too high it may cause unemployment
- Yes, by allowing the employer to set any wage it likes
- No, monopsony always benefits society as a whole
-
Labour supply is W = 10 + L and MFC = 10 + 2L. MRP is £40 per worker. What employment and wage does the monopsonist choose?
- Employment of 15 and a wage of £25
- Employment of 30 and a wage of £40
- Employment of 15 and a wage of £40
- Employment of 10 and a wage of £20
-
In the competitive benchmark for the same market (W = 10 + L, MRP = 40), what are employment and wage?
- Employment of 30 and a wage of £40
- Employment of 30 and a wage of £25
- Employment of 40 and a wage of £10
- Employment of 15 and a wage of £25
-
Why can a minimum wage set between the monopsony and competitive wage increase employment?
- A minimum wage always reduces employment in every market
- It removes the incentive to restrict hiring, since the employer must pay at least the minimum wage for each additional worker
- A minimum wage has no effect on employers' hiring decisions
- Monopsonists never adjust their hiring in response to any wage change
-
Which is a limitation of monopsony theory for real labour markets?
- Labour markets are always perfectly competitive in practice
- Workers may move between employers, and unions, bargaining and imperfect information complicate predictions
- Monopsony never exists in practice anywhere in the economy
- Monopsony depends only on product prices and not on labour supply
-
Evaluate: does monopsony always reduce employment?
- True in all cases, regardless of any market conditions
- True, because monopsony always increases the wage above competition
- Overstated: monopsony usually leads to lower employment than the competitive level, but outcomes depend on market conditions
- False, because monopsony never pays any wages to workers
Related quizzes
- Sizes and types of firms Quiz · 3.1.1 · 20 questions
- How businesses grow Quiz · 3.1.2 · 20 questions
- Demergers Quiz · 3.1.3 · 20 questions
- Business objectives Quiz · 3.2.1 · 20 questions
- Revenue Quiz · 3.3.1 · 20 questions
- Costs Quiz · 3.3.2 · 20 questions
- Economies and diseconomies of scale Quiz · 3.3.3 · 20 questions
- Normal profits, supernormal profits and losses Quiz · 3.3.4 · 20 questions
- Efficiency Quiz · 3.4.1 · 20 questions
- Perfect competition Quiz · 3.4.2 · 20 questions