Lesson RS-3
RS-3 Identify bias and misuse of evidence Quiz: AQA English Language, Unit 3
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson RS-3, Identify bias and misuse of evidence: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA GCSE English Language (8700), Unit 3: Assessment objectives, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
Which of these best describes bias in a text?
- A one-sided presentation that favours one view, often by leaving out or distorting evidence
- A text that includes statistics, which always makes the argument neutral and fair to both sides
- A text that uses more than one paragraph, so the writer has explored the topic at some length
- A text written in the present tense, which makes it sound more immediate and modern to readers
-
Which example shows a misuse of evidence?
- Citing a survey of 1,200 people from across the country, with the sample method explained
- Citing a survey of 12 people from one street as proof of the views of the whole country
- Citing a government figure and noting that it was revised in a later, updated publication
- Citing a published report from a national statistics body with its date and source named
-
A writer says 'Most people agree' but cites no source. What is the best reason to question this?
- The claim uses the word 'most', which is always a sign that the writer is lying to the reader
- The claim is short, and short claims are always false according to the usual guidance
- The claim is written in a formal tone, which suggests the writer is trying to deceive readers
- The claim is not supported by evidence, so the reader cannot check how many people hold the view
-
A charity report uses a photograph of one sad child to describe a whole region. What kind of bias is this?
- Emotive, unrepresentative evidence that may encourage a reader to generalise from one example
- Balanced, factual reporting that gives the reader a fair and complete picture of the situation
- Neutral, statistical evidence that has been checked by an independent body and verified
- Accurate scientific observation in which the sample size has been fully justified by the writer
-
Which phrase most clearly signals that a writer is presenting an opinion as a fact?
- 'The data was collected from hospital records covering the years between 2015 and 2020'
- 'Everyone knows that the plan is clearly the only sensible option available to the council'
- 'The survey was conducted in March, and 320 people responded to the questionnaire sent out'
- 'According to the figures published in the annual report, spending rose by four per cent'
-
A writer compares two cities using only the best statistics for one and the worst for the other. What is this?
- A neutral method, because each statistic is accurate even if it has been chosen carefully
- Full and balanced use of evidence, which is the best way to compare two different places
- Standard academic practice, because comparisons always need the extremes to show contrast
- Selective use of evidence, which can give a misleading impression of the overall picture
-
Which feature suggests a source may be less reliable?
- The writer names the organisation that carried out the survey and states the year it was done
- The writer does not name the source of the statistics and gives no date for when they were collected
- The writer acknowledges a limitation of the study and explains how it might affect the results
- The writer states the sample size and explains how the people in the sample were chosen
-
Which is an example of emotive language used to persuade rather than inform?
- The council's budget for the year was set at four million pounds, as the minutes record
- The reckless council has wasted millions of pounds on a scheme that nobody asked for
- The council has published a budget that includes spending on roads, parks and libraries
- The council meeting was held on Tuesday in the main hall of the town's civic centre
-
A text says 'Four out of five dentists recommend this toothpaste' but names no sample or study. What is the main issue?
- The claim cannot be checked, so the evidence is unsupported and may be misused to sell the product
- The claim is too long, since a product claim should always be expressed in a single short word
- The claim is in the present tense, which automatically makes the statistic false and misleading
- The claim uses a fraction, which is never allowed in advertising and must always be replaced
-
Which is the best way to identify bias in a non-fiction text?
- Note whether the text has a title, since any text without a title is always biased against readers
- Count how many exclamation marks appear, since bias is shown by the number of exclamation marks
- See whether the text uses a picture, because images in a text always show that it is biased
- Check whether the writer presents only one side, uses loaded words and reports evidence selectively
-
A writer says 'Doctors are unanimous' to support a claim, but the cited study has 14 doctors. What is the best response?
- Reject the claim entirely, because doctors are never unanimous on any health question at any time
- Accept the claim fully, because any study with more than ten doctors is always sufficient evidence
- Note that the sample is very small and the word 'unanimous' overstates what the study shows
- Accept the claim, because unanimity means all doctors agree, and the number 14 is a large group
-
Which sentence most clearly misuses a statistic?
- Crime fell by 2 per cent last year, although the figures for the previous year were revised upwards
- Crime fell by 2 per cent last year, so the town is now dangerous for anyone walking alone at night
- Crime fell by 2 per cent last year, according to the police figures published in their annual report
- Crime fell by 2 per cent last year, and the report notes that the change was small and uncertain
-
Which of the following is an example of a source with clear bias?
- A government statistical bulletin explaining the method used, the sample size and the margin of error
- A museum guide listing the dates of construction for each building and the names of its architects
- A party's campaign leaflet listing its own successes but ignoring the policies that failed to deliver
- An independent academic review summarising studies on the topic and noting disagreement between them
-
What is the danger of an argument that relies on a single anecdote?
- Anecdotes are always the most accurate evidence, because they come from people who saw events directly
- One personal story may not represent the wider population, so it is a weak form of evidence
- Anecdotes are always fictional, so they should never be included in any non-fiction text at all
- Anecdotes help a writer to use the present tense, which makes an argument sound more trustworthy
-
Which kind of evidence is generally the most reliable for a claim about national trends?
- Data from a large, representative sample, collected with a stated method and cited with its source
- A rumour passed on by a friend who heard it from someone else at a party last weekend
- A comment posted anonymously online by someone who claims to have seen the events happen
- A single interview with one person who has strong feelings about the topic under discussion
-
A text quotes a politician as saying 'We will never raise taxes', but omits the words 'unless the economy grows'. What is this?
- A neutral summary, since quotations are always shortened for clarity in non-fiction writing
- A complete account of the politician's view, because quotations should never include conditions
- Accurate quotation, because the words included are exactly what the politician said at the time
- Misleading use of a quotation, because the omitted words change the meaning of the statement
-
A writer presents an opinion about a new tax as though it were the verdict of an expert panel. What is this an example of?
- A quotation that has been checked against the original report and confirmed as correct overall
- Misrepresenting the source of a claim, which makes an opinion look like authoritative evidence
- Accurate attribution of a view, since expert opinions are always presented as fact in full
- A balanced summary, because it gives two sides of the debate in one short and clear statement
-
Which phrase best signals that a writer is using loaded language?
- Describing a cheap and sensible policy as a shameful waste of money that no decent person would support
- Describing the policy as being introduced in April and reviewed by a committee at the end of the year
- Describing the policy as one that costs two million pounds and affects around ten thousand residents
- Describing the policy as a change to the rules that applies in the first and second year of study
-
A chart's vertical axis starts at 90 rather than zero, making a small rise look dramatic. What is this?
- A neutral presentation, because the axis shows every value in the data set without any omissions
- A standard and accurate method, since charts should always start at the highest value on the scale
- An accurate statistic, because the chart is labelled clearly and the figures are correct as shown
- A misleading presentation of evidence, which exaggerates the size of the change for the reader
-
Which claim is the most cautious and therefore least likely to be a bias or overstatement?
- The study confirms that the treatment is safe and effective for everyone, without any exceptions
- The study shows that the treatment is a miracle cure that makes all other treatments pointless
- The study suggests that the treatment may help some patients, though more research is needed
- The study proves that the treatment helps every patient, and there is no doubt about this result
Related quizzes
- Identify and interpret explicit information and ideas Quiz · AO1-1 · 20 questions
- Draw inferences: identify and interpret implicit information Quiz · AO1-2 · 20 questions
- Select and synthesise evidence from different texts Quiz · AO1-3 · 20 questions
- Explain how writers use vocabulary and grammar to achieve effects Quiz · AO2-1 · 20 questions
- Analyse how writers use structure to influence readers Quiz · AO2-2 · 20 questions
- Use subject terminology to support views Quiz · AO2-3 · 20 questions
- Compare ideas and perspectives across two or more texts Quiz · AO3-1 · 20 questions
- Compare how ideas and perspectives are conveyed Quiz · AO3-2 · 20 questions
- Evaluate texts critically Quiz · AO4-1 · 20 questions
- Support evaluation with textual references Quiz · AO4-2 · 20 questions