Lesson 3.2.4.5.2
3.2.4.5.2 Wiles' study of the effectiveness of CBT; reductionist and holistic perspectives Quiz: AQA Psychology, Unit 8
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.2.4.5.2, Wiles' study of the effectiveness of CBT; reductionist and holistic perspectives: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA GCSE Psychology (8182), Unit 8: Psychological problems, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What is Wiles' study in the specification about?
- The effects of social media on the sleep patterns of young adults
- The effect of diet on blood pressure in a group of children over time
- The effectiveness of a surgical method used to treat injuries to the brain
- The effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy in treating depression
-
Which concept do Wiles' study and CBT both relate to?
- The genetic causes of eye colour that are passed down through families
- The biological mechanism of blood clotting in the veins of the body
- The effectiveness of a psychological treatment for depression
- The chemistry of fuel combustion in a car engine on a cold morning
-
Why would a psychologist evaluate a study of CBT's effectiveness?
- To prove that CBT always works for every single person who receives it
- To judge whether the treatment really improves mental health compared with alternatives
- To remove all need for any other form of treatment in the health service
- To decide which colour the therapy room should be painted in the clinic
-
A study of CBT's effectiveness uses symptom scores before and after treatment. What is being measured?
- The number of neurons in the participants' brains counted after each session
- The change in the level of symptoms associated with the treatment
- The speed of the participants' reactions to a flash of light in the lab
- The height of the participants measured before and after the treatment sessions
-
Which is a reason to be cautious about concluding that CBT is effective for everyone?
- Results from one study always apply to every person on the planet equally
- Results never show any effect at all in any of the people who take part
- Results are always identical across every study that has ever been carried out
- Results may vary between individuals and between different settings
-
What does 'reductionist' mean when evaluating CBT?
- Explaining the outcome of CBT using a brain scan as the only type of evidence
- Explaining the outcome of CBT using only one cause, such as thought change
- Explaining the outcome of CBT without using any evidence from studies at all
- Explaining the outcome of CBT using many causes at the same time in one account
-
Why might a holistic perspective be used when evaluating CBT?
- It considers only the person's thoughts and ignores everything else in their life
- It considers only the person's brain chemistry and nothing else about them
- It considers the person's thoughts, behaviour, relationships and wider context together
- It considers only the number of sessions that the person attended in the clinic
-
Which is a reductionist criticism of CBT's explanation of recovery?
- It includes the person's whole life story in every analysis that is made
- It may ignore biological and social factors that also affect how a person recovers
- It uses many causes to explain every single outcome of the treatment
- It considers every factor and ignores none of the influences on recovery
-
Which feature of CBT would a holistic evaluation count as a strength?
- It reduces the whole problem to one chemical level in the brain of the person
- It considers how thoughts and behaviour connect to the person's wider life
- It relies on one brain scan result as the only evidence of progress made
- It ignores the person's thoughts and feelings entirely during the sessions
-
Which measure would be most useful to a researcher evaluating whether CBT is effective?
- The participant's shoe size recorded after the treatment has finished
- The participant's favourite colour recorded before the treatment begins
- The time taken by the participant to finish a crossword puzzle in the lab
- A standard depression scale completed before and after the treatment
-
A study finds CBT improves depression scores more than a control group. What is the appropriate conclusion?
- CBT shows no difference from no treatment, so the apparent improvement must be a measurement error
- CBT improves scores only in the control group, so the therapy group's result should be ignored
- CBT appears more effective than no treatment in this study, but findings must be evaluated carefully
- CBT is proven to cure all depression permanently in every person who receives it
-
Why is a control group useful in a study of CBT effectiveness?
- It ensures that all participants receive exactly the same brain scan in the study
- It guarantees that the treatment will be successful for the people taking it
- It shows whether improvement is due to the treatment rather than other factors
- It replaces the need for any outcome measure in the study design at all
-
What is a limitation of evaluating CBT with self-report questionnaires?
- Self-report data always show exactly the same results every time they are used
- Self-report data cannot be analysed statistically in any way by researchers
- Participants may answer in ways that are influenced by expectations or their mood
- Self-report data are always more accurate than any other type of evidence available
-
Which statement about reductionist and holistic perspectives is most accurate?
- Reductionist views consider many factors, while holistic views use only one cause
- Both perspectives use exactly the same methods and the same assumptions about people
- Reductionist views simplify causes, while holistic views weigh many factors
- Both perspectives ignore all evidence from studies and rely on opinion alone
-
A researcher concludes that CBT works because of thought change alone. Which perspective does this reflect?
- A neutral perspective that makes no assumptions about the cause of change
- A reductionist perspective, because it reduces the outcome to one factor
- A genetic perspective, because it looks at inherited differences in people
- A holistic perspective, because it considers the whole person and their context
-
Why might long-term follow-up be important when evaluating CBT?
- It shows whether the patient's shoes are comfortable during the sessions
- It shows whether the therapist enjoyed working with the patient each week
- It shows whether the benefits last after the treatment has ended
- It shows whether the room in the clinic was painted recently by staff
-
A study of CBT includes participants from only one town. What is the main limitation?
- Findings are always more accurate than national data collected across many areas
- Findings cannot be analysed at all because the sample comes from one place
- Findings must be false because only one town was used in the research
- Findings may not generalise to people from different areas or backgrounds
-
What is the purpose of evaluating an intervention such as CBT?
- To judge how well it works and for whom, using evidence
- To find out which area of the brain is the largest in the adult population
- To decide whether the therapist should wear a uniform during the sessions
- To count how many people attend the clinic each year for appointments
-
A reviewer says Wiles' study shows CBT is effective, and notes it only considered thought change. Which perspective is the reviewer applying?
- A neutral evaluation that has no link to the mechanisms by which change occurs
- A reductionist evaluation that focuses on one mechanism of change
- A holistic evaluation that includes many mechanisms of change in one account
- A genetic evaluation that looks at the participants' DNA in the study sample
-
Which evidence would best support a claim that CBT's effect is maintained over time?
- A single measurement taken during the very first session of the treatment
- Follow-up measurements taken months after the end of treatment
- A measurement of the room temperature during the sessions in the clinic
- A count of how many words the therapist used during each of the sessions
Related quizzes
- Encoding, storage and retrieval: how memories are encoded and stored Quiz · 3.1.1.1.1 · 20 questions
- Difference between sensation and perception Quiz · 3.1.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Brain structures from the womb: brain stem, thalamus, cerebellum, cortex Quiz · 3.1.3.1.1 · 20 questions
- Null and alternative hypotheses Quiz · 3.1.4.1.1 · 20 questions
- Social and dispositional factors affecting conformity to majority influence Quiz · 3.2.1.1.1 · 20 questions
- Piaget's theory: language depends on thought Quiz · 3.2.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Central and peripheral (somatic and autonomic) nervous systems Quiz · 3.2.3.1.1 · 20 questions
- Episodic, semantic and procedural memory Quiz · 3.1.1.1.2 · 20 questions
- Monocular depth cues: height in plane, relative size, occlusion, linear perspective Quiz · 3.1.2.2.1 · 20 questions
- Roles of nature and nurture in development Quiz · 3.1.3.1.2 · 20 questions