Lesson 4.2.3.T5
4.2.3.T5 Case studies Quiz: AQA Psychology, Unit 2
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.2.3.T5, Case studies: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Psychology (7182), Unit 2: Psychology in context, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
A case study is best described as:
- A large survey of many people across the country, using a standard questionnaire
- An in-depth investigation of a single individual or a small group
- A statistical analysis of secondary data from many studies pooled together
- A controlled experiment with random allocation of participants to each condition
-
A major strength of case studies is that they provide:
- Data that are always quantitative and easy to compare across many cases
- Rich, detailed data about an individual that other methods might miss
- Precise control over all extraneous variables through random allocation
- Results that generalise to the whole population, so the findings apply to everyone equally
-
A major limitation of case studies is:
- Lack of any qualitative data, so the findings are reduced to numbers only
- Excessive control over the variables, which makes the case artificial and rigid
- Low generalisability, because one case may not represent others
- Too many participants to analyse, so the data set becomes unmanageable
-
Case studies are particularly useful for studying:
- Trends in national statistics that are collected each year by government bodies
- Rare conditions or unusual cases, such as a specific type of brain damage
- Large populations with random sampling across a wide range of different regions
- Behaviour in controlled laboratory conditions only, using set tasks for every participant
-
Case study data are often retrospective. What is the main concern with this?
- Retrospective data are always more accurate than current data, since they are settled
- Retrospective data eliminate all ethical concerns, since the events have already passed
- Memory can be inaccurate or reconstructed, which may distort the data
- Retrospective data cannot be used in psychology, because it is always too unreliable
-
Case studies are generally low in control because:
- The participants are always in a laboratory, where every variable is strictly controlled
- The researcher cannot manipulate or hold constant the many variables affecting a single case
- The researcher always controls the independent variable, setting each level precisely in turn
- The researcher always uses random allocation, so the variables are balanced across cases
-
A case study of a patient with a rare memory disorder is conducted. Which feature makes this a case study?
- It uses a random sample of the population from a register
- It manipulates an IV across several conditions in a controlled laboratory setting
- It compares two large groups of participants with a control design
- It focuses in depth on one individual over time
-
A researcher studies a child with limited exposure to language to examine how language develops. What is this an example of?
- A correlational study with a large sample
- A case study
- A cross-sectional survey
- A laboratory experiment
-
A case study can be used to generate a hypothesis for later testing. What does this mean?
- The case study measures the hypothesis directly, using random allocation of the case
- The case study proves the hypothesis is true, so no further testing is ever needed
- The case may suggest ideas that can then be tested in more controlled studies
- The case study replaces the need for any further research on the topic at all
-
A case study based on a sample of one has which key problem?
- Findings must be presented as numerical data only
- Findings are always more reliable than in large samples
- Findings may not be generalisable to other people
- Findings will show a causal relationship automatically
-
A case study uses interviews, school records and diaries to build a detailed account. What is this approach called?
- Counterbalancing of the conditions used in the study design
- Random allocation of data to different groups in the analysis
- Operationalisation of the key variables into measurable terms
- Triangulation of multiple data sources
-
What is a key limitation of case studies when attempting to establish cause-and-effect?
- They always show causes with certainty, because every detail of the case is recorded
- They never use any qualitative information, since the focus is entirely on measured numbers
- They cannot manipulate variables or use random allocation, so causal claims are weak
- They can only be carried out with children, because adult cases are too complex to study
-
A researcher's interpretation of a case study may be biased by their own expectations. What is this an example of?
- Researcher bias in interpreting the data
- Operational definition problems with the key measures
- Random sampling error in the selection of the cases
- Counterbalancing failure across the conditions studied
-
A single well-documented case shows that a claim is false. Why is this valuable?
- A single case always proves a claim is true, since one example is enough to confirm it
- A single counterexample can disprove a universal claim
- A single case cannot affect any scientific claim, however well it is documented
- A single case shows the claim applies to everyone in the population studied
-
Ethical guidelines require that case study participants' identities are protected. Which principle does this reflect?
- Standardisation
- Confidentiality
- Counterbalancing
- Random allocation
-
Which statement distinguishes a case study from a correlational study?
- A case study always uses random sampling of many cases, unlike correlations, which look at a single person in depth over a long period
- A case study describes one individual in depth, while a correlation measures the relationship between two variables across many cases
- Both methods involve manipulating an independent variable, which the researcher sets at each level chosen in advance of the data collection
- A correlation studies one individual in depth, while a case study measures two variables across a large group of cases over the same period
-
A researcher reports detailed findings from one patient and claims they apply to all patients with the same condition. What is the main weakness?
- Insufficient detail in the qualitative data that was collected from the patient
- Excessive use of control in the study, which restricted what could be observed
- Lack of any ethical approval for the report, which was never submitted to a committee
- Unjustified generalisation from one atypical case
-
Which evaluation of case studies is most accurate?
- They offer depth and insight into rare cases but limited generalisability and causal evidence
- They are the only method suitable for testing causation, because they manipulate variables directly
- They offer generalisable results and strong causal evidence across many different populations
- They offer large samples and precise statistical control over every variable in the study
-
What is a major limitation of a case study of one person with a rare brain injury?
- The findings may be unique to that individual and may not reflect the wider population
- No ethical issues can arise in the study, because the individual is only being described
- The sample is too large to analyse in any detail, so the data must be summarised in full
- The findings are always too precise to be meaningful for the individual or anyone else
-
Which method would a researcher most likely combine with a case study to strengthen its data?
- Interviews with family members and examination of medical records
- A randomised controlled trial with 1000 participants allocated to several conditions
- A correlation calculated on secondary census data from the national archive
- A laboratory experiment with random allocation to two conditions in a controlled room
Related quizzes
- Learning approaches: behaviourism and classical conditioning Quiz · 4.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Operant conditioning and social learning theory Quiz · 4.2.1.2 · 20 questions
- The cognitive approach Quiz · 4.2.1.3 · 20 questions
- The biological approach Quiz · 4.2.1.4 · 20 questions
- The psychodynamic approach Quiz · 4.2.1.5 · 20 questions
- Humanistic psychology Quiz · 4.2.1.6 · 20 questions
- Comparison of approaches Quiz · 4.2.1.7 · 20 questions
- Divisions of the nervous system and neurons Quiz · 4.2.2.1 · 20 questions
- Synaptic transmission Quiz · 4.2.2.2 · 20 questions
- Endocrine system and fight or flight Quiz · 4.2.2.3 · 20 questions