Lesson 4.2.3.1.3
4.2.3.1.3 Questionnaire and interview design, variables and operationalisation Quiz: AQA Psychology, Unit 2
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.2.3.1.3, Questionnaire and interview design, variables and operationalisation: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Psychology (7182), Unit 2: Psychology in context, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
The independent variable is:
- The number of participants in the study, which is set before the study starts
- The variable that the researcher manipulates or changes to observe its effect
- The variable that is measured as the outcome, which the researcher records afterwards
- A variable that is kept constant throughout the study so that it cannot change at all
-
The dependent variable is:
- The population from which the sample is taken, selected to represent a wider group
- An uncontrolled variable that varies randomly across the participants in the study
- The variable that is measured to see whether it changes in response to the IV
- The variable that the researcher manipulates in order to create the conditions tested
-
An extraneous variable is:
- A variable that is always removed from the study before any data are analysed at all
- A variable other than the IV that could affect the DV if it is not controlled
- The variable that the researcher measures as the outcome of the experiment in full
- The main variable that the study is designed to test, changed on purpose by the researcher
-
Operationalisation of a variable means:
- Recording the variable in a non-numerical way, using descriptions rather than figures
- Defining it in precise, measurable terms so it can be tested and replicated
- Assigning participants to conditions at random so that groups are balanced at the start
- Making the variable as complicated as possible so that it captures every detail
-
A closed question on a questionnaire:
- Gives respondents a fixed set of options to choose from
- Asks the respondent to explain a previous answer in more depth and detail
- Allows the respondent to write a free answer in their own words with no limit
- Is answered only by the interviewer, who records the respondent's view for them
-
An open question on a questionnaire:
- Requires a numerical rating on a fixed scale
- Is used only in structured observations
- Offers only two fixed answers, such as yes or no
- Allows respondents to answer in their own words
-
A confounding variable is one that:
- Varies systematically with the IV and affects the DV, so it offers an alternative explanation
- Is controlled by the participants themselves, who decide its level for each session run
- Is measured as the dependent variable, so it records the outcome the study is designed to explain
- Is randomly allocated to participants so that its effect is balanced across the conditions
-
A researcher wants to measure how happy participants are. Which operationalisation is most appropriate?
- A note about the weather on the day of testing
- A description of participants' facial expressions in general
- A statement that participants are happy or not
- A rating from 1 to 10 on a happiness scale
-
A question asks, 'Don't you agree that the new policy is fair?' What is the problem?
- The question is about a policy that cannot be measured, so it cannot give valid data
- The question is too short to be useful for the study, so it gives too little information
- The question uses only open response options, so the answers cannot be compared easily
- The question is leading, pushing respondents towards a particular answer
-
A question asks, 'Do you enjoy football and tennis?' What is the main problem?
- It uses an open response that cannot be analysed, because each answer is different
- It is too complicated to be understood by anyone who reads it for the first time without help from others
- It is double-barrelled, so a single answer cannot clearly represent two different topics
- It asks for a number instead of an opinion, so the answer is too narrow to use
-
A question asks, 'How often do you go out?' What is the main problem?
- It is a closed question with too many options, which makes choosing one hard
- It is ambiguous, because 'often' and 'go out' can be interpreted in different ways
- It is leading towards a particular response, so people are pushed to one answer
- It asks for a qualitative answer that cannot be recorded in any numerical form
-
A researcher measures stress by recording participants' heart rate. What is this an example of?
- Random allocation of participants to conditions in the study design used
- Operationalisation of stress as a physiological measure
- Operationalisation of stress as a self-report opinion, using a single item rating
- A confounding variable that varies with the independent variable in the study
-
A questionnaire includes technical jargon that many respondents do not understand. What is the best change?
- Ask respondents to guess what the words mean
- Remove all questions about the topic
- Add more jargon to make the questionnaire more formal
- Rewrite the question using simpler, clearer wording
-
In a study testing the effect of caffeine on reaction time, which is the independent variable?
- The reaction time measured in milliseconds for each participant in the study
- The amount of caffeine given to participants
- The room temperature during testing sessions carried out across the week
- The age of the participants recruited into the study from the community
-
Why should a questionnaire avoid double-barrelled questions?
- Because they cannot be used with closed options, which are needed for analysis
- Because they always produce qualitative data that are too rich to be coded
- Because they produce ambiguous answers that cannot be interpreted clearly
- Because they are too easy for respondents to answer, so the data lack challenge
-
Why is operationalisation important for the validity and replicability of a study?
- It removes the need for a dependent variable, since the measures are already defined by the researcher before the study begins at all
- It guarantees that all participants will respond identically to the same questions and stimuli in every session of the study
- Clear, measurable definitions allow other researchers to repeat the study and check that it measures the intended construct
- It makes every study a correlational design, so no experiment can ever be run with manipulated conditions or random allocation of people
-
In a study on noise and memory, testing takes place in the morning for one group and the afternoon for another. What is the extraneous variable?
- The level of noise, which is the IV that the researcher deliberately manipulates
- The memory score, which is the DV that the researcher records for each person
- Time of day, which could affect alertness and memory performance
- The sample size, which is always controlled by the researcher before the study
-
Why does a structured interview usually improve replicability compared with an unstructured interview?
- Because it always produces qualitative data that are rich and full of detail to analyse
- Because the same questions are asked in the same order each time, which can be repeated exactly
- Because it removes the need for any questions, so the interview becomes a simple talk
- Because it allows the interviewer to follow every new idea that comes up in conversation
-
A researcher uses a five-point Likert scale to measure attitudes. Why is this appropriate?
- It converts attitudes into ordered numerical responses that can be compared
- It removes all bias from the attitude measurement, so responses are fully objective
- It records only the participant's open comments, which are then read for themes
- It measures the attitude directly in the brain, using a scanner placed on the head
-
Poor operationalisation of a concept is most likely to affect which type of validity?
- Inter-observer reliability, because two observers recorded the behaviour at different times
- Random sampling, because participants were randomly chosen from a list of the population
- Construct validity, because the measure may not capture what it claims to measure
- Temporal validity, because the study took place at a specific time that may have been unusual
Related quizzes
- Learning approaches: behaviourism and classical conditioning Quiz · 4.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Operant conditioning and social learning theory Quiz · 4.2.1.2 · 20 questions
- The cognitive approach Quiz · 4.2.1.3 · 20 questions
- The biological approach Quiz · 4.2.1.4 · 20 questions
- The psychodynamic approach Quiz · 4.2.1.5 · 20 questions
- Humanistic psychology Quiz · 4.2.1.6 · 20 questions
- Comparison of approaches Quiz · 4.2.1.7 · 20 questions
- Divisions of the nervous system and neurons Quiz · 4.2.2.1 · 20 questions
- Synaptic transmission Quiz · 4.2.2.2 · 20 questions
- Endocrine system and fight or flight Quiz · 4.2.2.3 · 20 questions