Lesson 4.2.5.2
4.2.5.2 Supply-side policies Quiz: AQA Economics, Unit 2
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.2.5.2, Supply-side policies: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Economics (7136), Unit 2: The national and international economy, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What is the difference between supply-side policies and supply-side improvements?
- They are the same thing, and the terms can be used interchangeably in every context
- Supply-side policies are measures to raise productive potential, while improvements are the actual rises in capacity that result
- Improvements are policies set by central banks, while policies are set by firms
- Supply-side policies are increases in output, while improvements are measures introduced by the government
-
How can supply-side policies help to achieve supply-side improvements in the economy?
- By raising productivity, improving incentives and removing barriers, which increases the economy's productive potential
- By increasing the exchange rate, which lowers the price of imports
- By reducing government spending on education and training
- By raising interest rates, which reduces the supply of money in the economy
-
Which of the following is an example of a free market supply-side policy?
- Privatisation of state-owned industries
- Government spending on research and development
- Subsidies to firms in declining industries
- Industrial policy directed by the state
-
Which of the following is an example of an interventionist supply-side policy?
- Cutting income tax to encourage work
- Government spending on education and training
- Privatising a state-owned rail company
- Deregulation of the financial sector
-
How might supply-side policies reduce the natural rate of unemployment?
- By improving skills and labour market flexibility, which reduces structural and frictional unemployment
- By reducing aggregate demand, which removes the need for jobs
- By increasing the exchange rate, which lowers wages
- By raising the price level, which reduces the number of unemployed workers
-
Why might tax changes designed to alter personal incentives increase the potential output of the economy?
- Higher tax rates always increase the incentive for entrepreneurs to start businesses
- Tax changes have no effect on potential output, which depends only on the money supply
- Lower tax rates can encourage more people to work, save and invest, raising the labour supply and capital stock
- Lower tax rates reduce the supply of labour, which raises the potential output of the economy
-
Why do supply-side changes often originate in the private sector?
- Government always creates all productivity improvements through direct spending
- Productivity improvements, innovation and investment are often driven by firms independently of government
- Supply-side changes only come from changes in interest rates set by the central bank
- Private firms are not able to improve productivity without government permission
-
Which policy is an example of intervention to correct a market failure related to short-termism?
- Privatisation of a national airline, which removes all government involvement
- Deregulating the banking sector to increase competition in lending
- Cutting corporation tax to encourage firms to pay higher dividends
- Government subsidies for research and development, which support long-term investment that firms may underprovide
-
The government cuts corporation tax to attract investment. What is the most likely effect on long-run aggregate supply and growth?
- It raises the price level in the short run, but has no effect on long-run growth
- It has no effect on LRAS, because tax changes only affect aggregate demand
- It may raise investment and productive capacity, shifting LRAS right and supporting a higher trend growth rate
- It reduces investment and productive capacity, shifting LRAS left and slowing growth
-
Why do supporters argue that privatisation can improve efficiency?
- Privatisation means the government sets the prices charged by all firms
- Privatisation removes all firms from the market, which reduces the cost of production
- Privatised firms face no competition, so they can raise prices without limit
- Private owners face competitive pressure and profit incentives that encourage cost control and innovation
-
A government deregulates the labour market by reducing employment protection. What is a likely effect on unemployment?
- It may reduce unemployment by making firms more willing to hire, though it may also reduce job security for workers
- It has no effect on unemployment, because it changes only wages
- It always raises unemployment, because firms stop hiring any workers at all
- It reduces the natural rate permanently to zero
-
Government-funded training raises the skills of unemployed workers. What is the likely effect on structural unemployment?
- It falls, because workers are better matched to available jobs
- It is unchanged, because training affects only frictional unemployment
- It rises, because training increases the number of people looking for work
- It becomes cyclical, because training depends on the level of demand
-
Improved productivity reduces the current account deficit. Through which route is this most likely?
- Higher productivity makes exports more competitive, raising export revenue and improving the trade balance
- Higher productivity lowers the exchange rate, which increases the deficit
- Higher productivity reduces exports, which lowers the deficit in the long run
- Higher productivity raises imports, which reduces the trade deficit
-
Which of the following is an interventionist supply-side policy rather than a free market policy?
- Industrial policy in which the state directs investment into strategic sectors
- Removing barriers to entry for new firms in an industry
- Privatising state assets to introduce competition
- Cutting income tax rates to increase the incentive to work
-
Evaluate the time lags involved in supply-side policies.
- Supply-side policies have immediate effects on capacity, with no time lag at all
- Supply-side policies never change productivity, so there are no lags to consider
- Supply-side policies often take years to affect productivity and capacity, so their benefits may come after the policy is announced
- Supply-side policies only work through interest rates, which act within a week
-
A government invests in road and rail infrastructure. What is the most likely supply-side effect?
- Only aggregate demand is affected, because infrastructure does not affect supply
- Transport costs fall and access to markets and labour improves, raising productive capacity
- The exchange rate appreciates, so the economy becomes less competitive
- Transport costs rise and productive capacity falls, because of increased government borrowing
-
Evaluate supply-side policies compared with demand-side policies in tackling persistent unemployment.
- Supply-side policies are always superior, because demand-side policies never affect unemployment
- Neither policy has any effect on unemployment in any circumstance
- Demand-side policies are always superior, because supply-side policies never affect unemployment
- Supply-side policies may address structural causes of unemployment, but they are slower and cannot fix a lack of demand alone
-
Supply-side policies such as privatisation can have microeconomic effects as well as macroeconomic effects. Which example illustrates a microeconomic effect?
- Changes in the national budget deficit following a tax cut
- Changes in the overall rate of inflation across the whole economy
- Changes in the exchange rate following a rise in interest rates
- Changes in competition and prices within a particular industry after privatisation
-
Why might supply-side policies not reduce inflation in the short term?
- Inflation is determined only by government spending in the short run
- Their effects on productive capacity take time, while inflation depends on demand and short-run costs
- Supply-side policies only affect the exchange rate, not prices
- Supply-side policies always raise inflation immediately, so they cannot reduce it
-
Evaluate whether free market supply-side policies improve welfare when a market failure exists.
- Not necessarily, because markets with market failure may need intervention to correct problems such as short-termism or externalities
- Yes, because market failures are always eliminated by free market policies
- Yes, free markets always maximise welfare, even when there are market failures
- No, free markets never affect welfare, whether or not there is any market failure
Related quizzes
- The objectives of government economic policy Quiz · 4.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Macroeconomic indicators Quiz · 4.2.1.2 · 20 questions
- Uses of index numbers Quiz · 4.2.1.3 · 20 questions
- Uses of national income data Quiz · 4.2.1.4 · 20 questions
- The circular flow of income Quiz · 4.2.2.1 · 20 questions
- Aggregate demand and aggregate supply analysis Quiz · 4.2.2.2 · 20 questions
- The determinants of aggregate demand Quiz · 4.2.2.3 · 20 questions
- Aggregate demand and the level of economic activity Quiz · 4.2.2.4 · 20 questions
- Determinants of short-run aggregate supply Quiz · 4.2.2.5 · 20 questions
- Determinants of long-run aggregate supply Quiz · 4.2.2.6 · 20 questions